We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Recommendation: Risky plastic and the limits to consumer responsibilization — R0/PR4
Summary
This recommendation paper critiques the use of risk framing in plastic governance, arguing that it places too much responsibility on individual consumers and obscures corporate and regulatory accountability. The paper calls for governance approaches that address systemic plastic production rather than relying on consumers to manage risk.
This paper highlights the limitations of the use of risk in plastic governance. First, plastic risk categorizations adapt, evolve, and shift, which creates ambiguities and insecurities for consumers about the responsible choices to be made. Second, the risk frame requires consumer agency to mitigate risk, a privilege many cannot afford. Third, the use of risk in plastic governance cedes power to dominant market actors who possess the capacity to blame others and use guilt appeal to alleviate their responsibility. The concluding remarks point to the importance of changing our minds about plastics. The argument is to stop thinking that plastics are flexible and malleable.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Recommendation: Global perceptions of plastic pollution: The contours and limits of debate — R0/PR4
This is a peer review recommendation for a study analyzing 39 published papers on public perceptions of plastic pollution, finding that research has focused mainly on marine ecosystems, single-use plastics, and microplastic risks while underexploring broader production reduction and climate-plastics links. The paper notes that framing choices in terminology shape public understanding and policy responses to the plastic pollution crisis.
Enhancing consumption responsibility to address global plastic pollution
This study examined how to enhance consumption responsibility as a strategy to address global plastic pollution, arguing that excessive consumption and unsound disposal drive marine and microplastic contamination and that a new global governance framework is needed to establish individual and collective accountability.
Micro-consumerist bollocks in the fight against plastic pollution: when good intentions - and regulatory initiatives - go awry
This commentary critiques individual-level consumer actions as insufficient responses to plastic pollution, arguing that regulatory initiatives focused on micro-consumerism have very limited impact on the scale of plastic contamination. The authors call for systemic policy changes targeting production and industrial waste rather than consumer behavior.
Recommendation: Current and future approaches to shifting businesses towards plastic-free packaging systems based on reduction and reuse — R0/PR4
This policy recommendation paper examines strategies for transitioning businesses away from plastic packaging toward reduction and reuse systems. While relevant to plastic pollution broadly, it is not focused on microplastics as a contaminant and contains no microplastic research data.
Recommendation: Addressing climate change mitigation: Implications for the sustainable alternatives to plastics — R0/PR4
This peer review recommendation discusses a paper on plastic waste accumulation and sustainable alternatives to plastics in the context of climate change mitigation. The document is part of the open peer review record and does not contain independent research findings.