We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
COVID-19's environmental impacts: Challenges and implications for the future
AI summary Read the abstract
COVID-19's positive environmental effects (especially CO2 emission reductions) were temporary and only detected in 2020, while its negative impacts -- particularly medical waste containing antibiotic resistance genes, heavy metals, and microplastics -- represent lasting challenges. International aviation CO2 dropped 59% in 2020 but industry emissions fell only 3.16%.
Strict measures have curbed the spread of COVID-19, but waste generation and movement limitations have had an unintended impact on the environment over the past 3 years (2020-2022). Many studies have summarized the observed and potential environmental impacts associated with COVID-19, however, only a few have quantified and compared the effects of these unintended environmental impacts; moreover, whether COVID-19 policy stringency had the same effects on the main environmental topic (i.e., CO emissions) across the 3 years remains unclear. To answer these questions, we conducted a systematic review of the recent literature and analyzed the main findings. We found that the positive environmental effects of COVID-19 have received more attention than the negative ones (50.6 % versus 35.7 %), especially in emissions reduction (34 % of total literature). Medical waste (14.5 %) received the highest attention among the negative impacts. Although global emission reduction, especially in terms of CO, has received significant attention, the positive impacts were temporary and only detected in 2020. Strict COVID-19 policies had a more profound and significant effect on CO emissions in the aviation sector than in the power and industry sectors. For example, compared with 2019, international aviation related CO emissions dropped by 59 %, 49 %, and 25 % in 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively, while industry related ones dropped by only 3.16 % in 2020. According to our developed evaluation matrix, medical wastes and their associated effects, including the persistent pollution caused by antibiotic resistance genes, heavy metals and microplastics, are the main challenges post the pandemic, especially in China and India, which may counteract the temporary environmental benefits of COVID-19. Overall, the presented results demonstrate methods to quantify the environmental effects of COVID-19 and provide directions for policymakers to develop measures to address the associated environmental issues in the post-COVID-19 world.
More Papers Like This
COVID-19, a double-edged sword for the environment: a review on the impacts of COVID-19 on the environment
AI summary Read the abstract
This review assessed pandemic-related environmental impacts, finding that COVID-19 reduced air and water pollution temporarily through industrial slowdowns but simultaneously increased plastic waste, antibiotic release, and chemical contamination from disinfectants, producing a mixed and complex environmental legacy.
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the environment, waste management, and energy sectors: a deeper look into the long-term impacts
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines the environmental consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, finding that while short-term air quality improvements occurred during lockdowns, the long-term negative effects are far more significant. Researchers documented massive increases in single-use plastic waste from masks, gloves, and packaging, contributing substantially to microplastic pollution. The study highlights that the pandemic reversed progress on waste reduction and created new challenges for environmental management across waste, energy, and pollution sectors.
COVID-19 and the environment: Temporary relief or a turning point?
AI summary Read the abstract
Analysis of 2020–2025 pandemic data showed that while COVID-19 lockdowns produced measurable improvements in air quality and emissions, these gains were temporary due to economic rebound effects, and the pandemic simultaneously caused a surge in single-use medical plastic waste. This underscores that without structural policy intervention, environmental improvements are transient, and plastic pollution from emergency healthcare responses can significantly worsen the microplastic burden in ecosystems.
The long-term impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on environmental health: a review study of the bi-directional effect
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed how the COVID-19 pandemic created a two-way relationship with environmental health, finding that lockdowns temporarily improved air and water quality while simultaneously driving a surge in single-use plastic waste and biohazard materials. The review calls for long-term sustainability policies that balance economic recovery with environmental protection, including reducing plastic pollution.
Impacts of COVID-19 Lockdowns on Environmental Degradation and Climate Change: A Review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examined how COVID-19 lockdowns created a global natural experiment revealing both the scale of improvement achievable through reduced human activity and new environmental pressures from pandemic waste. While lockdowns briefly improved air quality and water clarity, surges in PPE and medical plastic waste intensified microplastic pollution risks, and CO₂ emissions rebounded strongly by 2021, demonstrating that durable environmental gains require systemic policy change.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.