We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comparative toxicity of conventional versus compostable plastic consumer products: An in-vitro assessment
Summary
Researchers compared the toxicity of compostable plastics versus conventional plastics using cell-based laboratory tests. They found that compostable plastic extracts actually reduced cell viability more than conventional plastics, and this toxicity increased after exposure to sunlight or composting. The study suggests that compostable plastics may not always be the safer alternative and that their chemical composition warrants closer scrutiny.
This study investigates the toxicity of methanolic extracts obtained from compostable plastics (BPs) and conventional plastics (both virgin and recycled). Additionally, it explores the potential influence of plastic photodegradation and composting on toxic responses using a battery of in vitro assays conducted in PLHC-1 cells. The extracts of BPs, but not those of conventional plastics, induced a significant decrease in cell viability (<70%) in PLHC-1 cells after 24 h of exposure. Toxicity was enhanced by either photodegradation or composting of BPs. Extracts of conventional plastics, and particularly those of recycled plastics, induced 7-ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) activity and micronucleus formation in exposed cells, indicating the presence of significant amounts of CYP1A inducers and genotoxic compounds in the extracts, which was enhanced by photodegradation. These findings highlight the importance of investigating the effects of degradation mechanisms such as sunlight and composting on the toxicity of BPs. It is also crucial to investigate the composition of newly developed formulations for BPs, as they may be more harmful than conventional ones.
Sign in to start a discussion.