0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

How does buoyancy behavior impact microplastic transport in an estuarine environment?

The Science of The Total Environment 2023 31 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Emily Summers, Emily Summers, Emily Summers, Emily Summers, Jiabi Du, Jiabi Du, Jiabi Du, Kyeong Park, Kyeong Park, Kyeong Park, Karl Kaiser Kyeong Park, Karl Kaiser Karl Kaiser Karl Kaiser Karl Kaiser Karl Kaiser Kyeong Park, Karl Kaiser Karl Kaiser Karl Kaiser Karl Kaiser Karl Kaiser

Summary

Researchers used Lagrangian particle-tracking and hydrodynamic models to simulate microplastic transport in Galveston Bay, finding that negatively buoyant particles were retained roughly seven times longer than neutrally buoyant ones and followed different transport pathways, with projected sea-level rise expected to flush surface particles faster while trapping sinking particles longer.

Much is still unknown about the transport behavior of microplastic pollutants within the marine environment, particularly smaller scale coastal systems such as estuaries. Through the use of a Lagrangian particle-tracking model coupled with a validated 3D hydrodynamic model, we examined the transport, pathway and ultimate fate of microplastic particles, both in an idealized estuary and Galveston Bay, Texas, USA. Emphasis was placed on differences based on settling behavior (neutrally versus negatively buoyant), use of random walk for diffusion processes, and release location. For Galveston Bay, settling behavior had a noteworthy impact on both the transport pathway of microplastic particles, as well as overall time spent within the bay. Particles with negative buoyancy were retained approximately seven times longer than those with neutral buoyancy. Negatively buoyant particles also showed a tendency to be dispersed eastward to Trinity Bay through the bottom baroclinic flow, while neutrally buoyant particles took a more direct route along the ship channel to the mouth of the bay. Idealized model simulations suggest impact of settling depends on the vertical mixing strength. For a system with stronger tidal mixing, negatively buoyant particles with small settling velocities may still behave similarly to neutrally buoyant particles, and differences only become apparent for particles that sink rather quickly (> 10 m d). Future sea-level rise or channel deepening tends to flush out neutrally buoyant particles more quickly, while increasing the retention time for negatively buoyant particles. Our results suggest that plastics within estuaries could show substantially different behavior depending on their buoyancy characteristics, highlighting a need to quantify specific settling velocities of plastic pollutants entering the coastal estuarine system.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper