0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Microplastics analytics: why we should not underestimate the importance of blank controls

Microplastics and Nanoplastics 2023 46 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
C. Lauren Mills, Michael Noonan, Nicole Grechi, Nicole Grechi, Nicole Grechi, Nicole Grechi, Nicole Grechi, Nicole Grechi, Nicole Grechi, Nicole Grechi, Nicole Grechi, Nicole Grechi, Michael Noonan, C. Lauren Mills, C. Lauren Mills, C. Lauren Mills, Nicole Grechi, Nicole Grechi, C. Lauren Mills, C. Lauren Mills, C. Lauren Mills, C. Lauren Mills, Michael Noonan, Marcia de A. M. M. Ferraz, Marcia de A. M. M. Ferraz Michael Noonan, Marcia de A. M. M. Ferraz Marcia de A. M. M. Ferraz, Michael Noonan, Michael Noonan, Michael Noonan, Michael Noonan, Michael Noonan, Michael Noonan, Michael Noonan, Michael Noonan, Marcia de A. M. M. Ferraz, Marcia de A. M. M. Ferraz

Summary

This study highlights the critical importance of blank controls in microplastic research, demonstrating that laboratory and environmental contamination during sample processing can significantly compromise data reliability if not properly accounted for.

UNLABELLED: Recent years have seen considerable scientific attention devoted towards documenting the presence of microplastics (MPs) in environmental samples. Due to omnipresence of environmental microplastics, however, disentangling environmental MPs from sample contamination is a challenge. Hence, the environmental (collection site and laboratory) microplastics contamination of samples during processing is a reality that we must address, in order to generate reproducible and reliable data. Here we investigated published literature and have found that around 1/5 of studies failed to use blank controls in their experiments. Additionally, only 34% of the studies used a controlled air environment for their sample processing (laminar flow, fume hood, closed laboratory, clean room, etc.). In that regard, we have also shown that preparing samples in the fume hood, leads to more microplastics > 1 μm) contamination than preparing it in the laboratory bench and the laminar flow. Although it did not completely prevent microplastics contamination, the processing of sample inside the laminar flow is the best option to reduce sample contamination during processing. Overall, we showed that blank controls are a must in microplastics sample preparation, but it is often overlooked by researchers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43591-023-00065-3.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper