We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
An analytical approach to confidence interval estimation of river microplastic sampling
AI summary Read the abstract
This study proposes a statistical method using the Poisson distribution to calculate confidence intervals for microplastic concentration measurements from single river water samples — addressing a major gap in environmental monitoring where replicate sampling is often impossible. The method is reliable when at least 10 microplastic particles are captured, and achieves sampling errors within ±30% when 50 or more particles are present. Standardizing how uncertainty is reported will make microplastic data from different rivers and studies far more comparable.
Microplastics (MPs), plastic particles <5 mm in diameter, are emerging ubiquitous pollutants in natural environments, including freshwater ecosystems. As rivers facilitate efficient transport among landscapes, monitoring is crucial for elucidating the origin, dynamics, and fate of MPs. However, standardized methodologies for in situ sampling in freshwater environments remain undefined to date. Specifically, evaluating the sampling error of MP concentration estimates is crucial for comparing results among studies. This study proposes a novel method for computing confidence intervals (CIs) from a single estimate of numerical concentration (expressed in particles·m-3). MPs are expected to disperse according to purely random processes, such as turbulent diffusion, and to consequently exhibit a random distribution pattern that follows a Poisson point process. Accordingly, the present study introduced a framework based on the Poisson point process to compute CIs, which were validated using MP samples from two urban rivers in Chiba, Japan, obtained using a mesh with an opening size of 335 μm. Random number simulations revealed that the CIs were applicable when ≥10 MPs were present in a sample. Further, when ≥50 MPs were present in a sample, the sampling error (95% CI) was within ±30% of the concentration estimates. The proposed framework allows for the intercomparison of single river MP samples despite the lack of sample replicates. Further, the present study emphasizes that the volume of sampled river water is the only controllable parameter that can reduce the sampling error.
More Papers Like This
Variance and precision of microplastic sampling in urban rivers
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers assessed the variance and precision of microplastic sampling methods in urban rivers, finding that high spatial and temporal variability in microplastic concentrations requires carefully designed sampling strategies to obtain representative measurements and reliable data for river microplastic assessments.
Large Sample Volumes Improve Detection Reliability of Sparse Particles in Water: A Poisson Sampling Perspective
AI summary Read the abstract
This study examined microplastic accumulation in deep-sea holothurians (sea cucumbers), analyzing plastic particle types and loads in digestive tissues from abyssal specimens. The findings demonstrate that microplastic contamination has reached some of the deepest ocean environments through ingestion by benthic organisms.
Large Sample Volumes Improve Detection Reliability of Sparse Particles in Water: A Poisson Sampling Perspective
AI summary Read the abstract
This study investigated the role of quorum sensing in plastisphere microbial communities, examining how bacteria on microplastic surfaces coordinate behavior through chemical signaling. The findings suggest that plastic surfaces may promote quorum sensing and associated collective behaviors including biofilm formation and potential virulence.
A first estimation of uncertainties related to microplastic sampling in rivers
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers collected 16 water samples from a French river to test how sampling strategy affects microplastic concentration estimates. Results showed wide variability depending on net deployment time, highlighting that standardized methods are essential before data from different studies can be reliably compared.
How to establish detection limits for environmental microplastics analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper demonstrates that standard detection limit methods are inappropriate for microplastic count data because particle counts follow a Poisson distribution rather than a continuous distribution, and proposes a statistically appropriate alternative framework for environmental microplastic analysis.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.