0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Marine sponges as bioindicators of pollution by synthetic microfibers in Antarctica

The Science of The Total Environment 2023 12 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Andrea Corti, Giulia Pagano, Angelina Lo Giudice, Maria Papale, Carmen Rizzo, Maurizio Azzaro, Virginia Vinciguerra, Valter Castelvetro, Stefania Giannarelli

Summary

Marine sponges from Antarctica's Tethys Bay were analyzed for synthetic microfiber contamination using a chemical depolymerization technique, finding evidence of polyester and polyamide plastics including PBAT/PPTA fibers and nylon 6,6 in multiple species. Even in this remote polar environment, sponges concentrated microplastics from large volumes of filtered seawater, suggesting they can serve as sensitive early-warning bioindicators for microplastic pollution. The detection of plastic pollution in Antarctica underscores how truly global the microplastic contamination problem has become.

Different marine sponge species from Tethys Bay, Antarctica, were analyzed for contamination by polyester and polyamide microplastics (MPs). The PISA (Polymer Identification and Specific Analysis) procedure was adopted as it provides, through depolymerization and HPLC analysis, highly sensitive mass-based quantitative data. The study focused on three analytes resulting from the hydrolytic depolymerization of polyesters and polyamides: terephthalic acid (TPA), 6-aminohexanoic acid (AHA), and 1-6-hexanediamine (HMDA). TPA is a comonomer found in the polyesters poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(butylene adipate co terephthalate) (PBAT), and in polyamides such as poly(1,4-p-phenylene terephthalamide) (Kevlar™ and Twaron™ fibers) and poly(hexamethylene terephthalamide) (nylon 6 T). AHA is the monomer of nylon 6. HMDA is a comonomer of the aliphatic nylon 6,6 (HMDA-co-adipic acid) and of semi-aromatic polyamides such as, again, nylon 6 T (HMDA-co-TPA). Except for the biodegradable PBAT, these polymers exhibit high to extreme mechanical, thermal and chemical resistance. Indeed, they are used as technofibers in protective clothing able to withstand extreme conditions as those typical of Antarctica. Of the two amine monomers, only HMDA was found above the limit of quantification, and only in specimens of Haliclona (Rhizoniera) scotti, at a concentration equivalent to 27 μg/kg of nylon 6,6 in the fresh sponge. Comparatively higher concentrations, corresponding to 2.5-4.1 mg/kg of either PBAT or PPTA, were calculated from the concentration of TPA detected in all sponge species. Unexpectedly, TPA did not originate from PET (the most common textile fiber) as it was detected in the acid hydrolysate, whereas the PISA procedure results in effective PET depolymerization only under alkaline conditions. The obtained results showed that sponges, by capturing and concentrating MPs from large volumes of filtered marine waters, may be considered as effective indicators of the level and type of pollution by MPs and provide early warnings of increasing levels of pollution even in remote areas.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Characteristics of Microplastic in Selected Marine Sponges from Pasir Putih Situbondo, East Java, Indonesia

Microplastics were characterized in marine sponges collected from a specific ocean region, finding plastic particles of diverse polymer types embedded in sponge tissue. Marine sponges, as filter feeders, accumulate microplastics from surrounding water and may serve as useful bioindicators of ocean plastic contamination.

Article Tier 2

Sponges as bioindicators for microparticulate pollutants?

This study investigated whether sponges can serve as bioindicators of microparticle pollution in coral reef environments, finding that sponges incorporate foreign particles including microplastics from the surrounding water. Sponges could be useful sentinel organisms for monitoring microplastic contamination in reef ecosystems given their extensive filter feeding.

Article Tier 2

Incidence and identification of microfibers in ocean waters in Admiralty Bay, Antarctica

Zooplankton samples from five sites in Admiralty Bay, Antarctica collected during the 2010–2011 austral summer were analyzed for microfibers, finding an average of 2.40 microfibers per 100 m³ with blue, red, black, and clear fibers ranging from 10–22 μm in diameter. The study establishes the presence of synthetic microfibers in Antarctic zooplankton sampling zones, confirming contamination of this remote polar marine environment.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic distribution in urban vs pristine mangroves: Using marine sponges as bioindicators of environmental pollution

Researchers collected marine sponges from urban and pristine mangrove environments and measured microplastic content, finding significantly higher MP loads in urban sponges and demonstrating that sessile benthic sponges can serve as effective bioindicators of coastal microplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Sponges as Sentinels of Coastal Water Quality and Microplastic Contamination in Mallorca, Western Mediterranean

Researchers used marine sponges as bioindicators to assess coastal water quality and microplastic contamination in the Mediterranean Sea. Sponge tissues accumulated MPs reflecting local pollution levels, and the authors proposed standardized protocols for using sponges as long-term sentinel organisms for plastic monitoring.

Share this paper