0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Balancing the consequences of in-water cleaning of biofouling to improve ship efficiency and reduce biosecurity risk

Frontiers in Marine Science 2023 6 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Chris Scianni, Eugene Georgiades, Ralitsa Mihaylova, Mario N. Tamburri

Summary

Cleaning biofouling from ship hulls underwater prevents the spread of invasive species and improves fuel efficiency, but the process releases microplastics from antifouling coatings, live organisms, and dissolved biocides into the surrounding water. This policy analysis argues that while capture and treatment technologies can reduce — but not eliminate — these risks, policymakers must weigh the full suite of tradeoffs when regulating in-water hull cleaning.

Effective environmental policy often involves introducing and maintaining important activities with positive outcomes while minimizing environmental consequences; essentially decoupling a positive activity from its negative impacts. In-water cleaning (IWC) of biofouling from ships’ submerged surfaces is an example of an activity with positive outcomes (e.g., maintaining optimal ship energy efficiency and decreased biosecurity risk) and unintended negative consequences (e.g., release of living organisms, biocides, and microplastics). Several approaches exist to mitigate these negative consequences, including debris capture, with primary and secondary treatment of removed particulate and dissolved materials. However, it is unlikely that these approaches will eliminate environmental risk. Policy makers should be aware of the full suite of risks related to ship IWC and the tradeoffs to consider when balancing mitigation approaches.

Share this paper