Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

An assessment of the ecosystem services of marine zooplankton and the key threats to their provision

Ecosystem Services 2023 27 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.

Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Zara L.R. Botterell, Zara L.R. Botterell, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Zara L.R. Botterell, Zara L.R. Botterell, Zara L.R. Botterell, Zara L.R. Botterell, Zara L.R. Botterell, Zara L.R. Botterell, Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Nicola Beaumont, Nicola Beaumont, Nicola Beaumont, Nicola Beaumont, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Zara L.R. Botterell, Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Nicola Beaumont, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Nicola Beaumont, Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Nicola Beaumont, Nicola Beaumont, Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Zara L.R. Botterell, Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Richard C. Thompson, Penelope K. Lindeque

Summary

Researchers conducted the first comprehensive assessment of the ecosystem services that marine zooplankton provide, including supporting fisheries, carbon cycling, and nutrient transport. They found that stressors such as microplastic pollution, climate change, and overfishing could significantly reduce these services, with downstream effects on food security and human well-being. The study highlights that protecting zooplankton populations is essential for maintaining the broader benefits that healthy oceans provide to society.

Zooplankton are a key group of organisms at the base of the marine food web and are fundamental to providing a broad range of societal and economic benefits which have previously remained poorly defined. This research addresses this knowledge gap through the provision of a first full assessment of zooplankton ecosystem services and disservices. Anthropogenic stressors such as microplastic pollution, climate change, and fisheries, could negatively affect the marine ecosystem services provided to humans and therefore have a negative impact on human well-being through reduction in food security, livelihoods, income, and good health. Deploying a mixed methodology approach including a semi-systematic literature review and ecological impact assessment, we provide novel evidence of the effects of microplastic pollution (high and low concentrations), fisheries, and climate change on the ecosystem services of three important zooplankton groups (copepods, jellyfish, and krill). We show that the majority of impacts on ecosystem services are negative, with the exception of climate change on jellyfish ecosystem services. Climate change and high microplastic concentration are evidenced to have the most substantial negative impacts on copepods and krill, with accompanying implications for the ecosystem services of climate regulation, water conditions, other materials, science, and entertainment. High microplastic concentration also depressed ecosystem service provision for jellyfish, impacting the services of genetic materials, climate regulation, water conditions, education, and entertainment. Fisheries are also evidenced to have negative impacts on all three zooplankton groups. In the case of jellyfish, climate change is evidenced to have a positive impact on the group’s ecosystem service provision in every category except experiential experiences, which is inversely related to increasing population, owing to their negative perception due to sting injuries. The evidence presented in this study shows that by maintaining sustainable fisheries, reducing plastic pollution, and minimising climate change, we will be actively investing in the current and future provision of marine ecosystem services and the human well-being benefits that they provide.

Read via DOI Download PDF

Share this paper

Post Share Share Pin Email