0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Reproductive & Development Sign in to save

Sharing communication insights of the citizen science program Plastic Pirates—best practices from 7 years of engaging schoolchildren and teachers in plastic pollution research

Frontiers in Environmental Science 2023 13 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Sinja Dittmann, Tim Kiessling, Sinja Dittmann, Tim Kiessling, Sinja Dittmann, Sinja Dittmann, Tim Kiessling, Tim Kiessling, Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Linda Mederake, Tim Kiessling, Doris Knoblauch, Sinja Dittmann, Sinja Dittmann, Tim Kiessling, Linda Mederake, Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Martín Thiel Tim Kiessling, Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Sinja Dittmann, Sinja Dittmann, Martín Thiel Tim Kiessling, Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Tim Kiessling, Martín Thiel Tim Kiessling, Martín Thiel Tim Kiessling, Linda Mederake, Katrin Knickmeier, Tim Kiessling, Mandy Hinzmann, Mandy Hinzmann, Mandy Hinzmann, Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Katrin Knickmeier, Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Mandy Hinzmann, Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Sinja Dittmann, Katrin Knickmeier, Sinja Dittmann, Doris Knoblauch, Katrin Knickmeier, Marianne Böhm‐Beck, Martín Thiel Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Marianne Böhm‐Beck, Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Martín Thiel Sinja Dittmann, Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Sinja Dittmann, Tim Kiessling, Martín Thiel Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Martín Thiel Tim Kiessling, Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel

Summary

The Plastic Pirates citizen science program in Germany engaged schoolchildren and teachers in monitoring plastic pollution in rivers over seven years, and this paper shares the communication strategies that made the program work at scale. Effective participant recruitment, guidance, and feedback loops enabled the program to generate peer-reviewed scientific data while building environmental literacy. The lessons offer a replicable model for using citizen science to expand microplastic monitoring coverage beyond what professional researchers can achieve alone.

Engaging the general public in research processes through citizen science allows for innovative scientific studies and makes science accessible to the general public. Effective communication strategies are crucial for the success of such initiatives. The citizen science program Plastic Pirates investigated the plastic pollution of rivers and implemented a variety of communication strategies with participating schoolchildren, teachers, and youth groups (e.g., sport associations, scouts or educational vacation programs, representing approximately 6% of participating groups). These were continuously revised and adapted since its start in 2016. Without time-efficient communication and strategies to keep track of conversations, it would not have been possible to achieve the scientific and educational goals of the program, i.e., to help teachers increase the environmental awareness and scientific literacy of their schoolchildren, and to produce peer-reviewed articles based on the collected citizen science data. Communication within the Plastic Pirates program was divided into four distinct phases: 1) recruiting and motivating participants, 2) coordination and guidance of participants, 3) data reception and revision, and 4) sharing updates and results. Some of the obstacles that had to be overcome to achieve successful communication were e.g., time constraints to obtaining scientific data from the participants, the time lag between the active involvement of the participants and the actual data analysis and publication of results, and limited personnel resources available for communication efforts. Our recommendations for other citizen science practitioners include regular and transparent communication with the participants regarding their contribution, the use of adequate and various communication channels, shifting the workload from the participants to the coordinating team of a citizen science initiative, as well as offering feedback on the research findings to the citizen scientists, thereby disseminating the results of the program.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper