0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Changes in concentrations of potentially toxic elements during storage of hard river water samples at low temperatures using different sample preservation procedures

Journal of Soils and Sediments 2023 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Matthias Zessner Matthias Zessner Radmila Milačić, Katarina Marković, Stefan Marković, Janez Ščančar, Zsolt Jolánkai, Adrienne Clement, Adrienne Clement, Ildikó Musa, Ildikó Musa, Máté Krisztián Kardos, Ottavia Zoboli, Matthias Zessner

Summary

Researchers compared two sample preservation procedures - on-site filtration and acidification before freezing versus freezing then thawing before filtration - for determining potentially toxic element concentrations in hard river water by ICP-MS. They found that freezing unfiltered hard water samples can trigger calcium carbonate precipitation and co-precipitation of trace elements, potentially biasing monitored concentrations and challenging the Water Framework Directive-recommended protocol.

Study Type Environmental

Abstract Purpose According to standard procedure recommended by the Water Framework Directive (WFD), dissolved concentrations of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in river water are determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) in filtered (0.45 µm) and acidified (pH 2) samples. Properly prepared and stored composite samples can enhance the temporal representativity of monitoring without increasing analytical costs. For this purpose, the WFD recommends freezing, which can preserve the species integrity and prevent adsorption processes of PTEs. Methods Low storage temperature in hard water samples can trigger precipitation of calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) and subsequent co-precipitation of PTEs. To test and determine to what extent co-precipitation with CaCO 3 can influence the determination of PTE concentrations, composite river water samples from two case study catchments in Hungary (Zagyva and Koppány) were prepared following two different sample preservation procedures. To study the behavior of PTEs in river water during storage, in the first procedure, samples were frozen, and they were thawed, filtered, and acidified directly prior to the analysis. In the second procedure, samples were filtered on-site and acidified prior to freezing to prevent precipitation of CaCO 3 and then only thawed to carry out the chemical analyses. Concentrations of PTEs were determined by ICP-MS. Results A statistical evaluation of the results using Student’s t -test revealed significant differences between the two sample preservation procedures, suggesting that PTEs were largely co-precipitated with CaCO 3 if the samples were not acidified prior to freezing. Conclusion When establishing protocols for sample preservation procedures, the phenomenon of co-precipitation of PTEs with CaCO 3 should be considered if the samples were not acidified before freezing. Therefore, to prevent co-precipitation of PTEs with CaCO 3 , samples should be filtered and acidified before freezing.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper