0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Widespread microplastic pollution in Indiana, USA, rivers

River Research and Applications 2023 14 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Whitney M. Conard, Katherine E. O’Reilly, Carson S. Hartlage, Gary A. Lamberti

Summary

Researchers surveyed nine Indiana river watersheds and found microplastics in every single one, regardless of whether the surrounding land was urban, agricultural, or forested. Plastic fibers dominated across all sites, suggesting they arrive mainly via atmospheric deposition rather than runoff, which means even remote waterways are exposed. The findings indicate that rivers have a distinct microplastic profile compared to large lakes, and that flowing water ecosystems are pervasively contaminated throughout the midwestern United States.

Study Type Environmental

Abstract Microplastics (i.e., plastic particles <5 mm in size) are aquatic contaminants of emerging concern but are poorly quantified in flowing waters of the midwestern USA. Microplastics enter streams and rivers through a variety of pathways (e.g., wastewater effluent, breakdown of larger plastic debris, atmospheric deposition) and can potentially harm aquatic organisms through both direct consumption and indirect contamination from sorbed toxins. In this study, we quantified microplastic concentrations and types (i.e., beads, fibers, films, foams, fragments) in nine Indiana watersheds representing a gradient of dominant land use (i.e., agricultural, urban, and forested). We predicted that microplastic concentration would be higher in watersheds with higher percentages of urban and agricultural land use than in forested watersheds. Our results revealed measurable quantities of microplastics in samples from all watersheds, but microplastic concentration did not vary significantly with land use or longitudinally within watersheds. Fibers were the dominant form of microplastic at all sites, suggesting that fibers may be transported primarily through atmospheric deposition rather than via direct runoff from the surrounding landscape. We conclude that rivers have a different microplastic “signature” than large lakes, likely due to retention characteristics of flowing water ecosystems, unique microplastic sources, and a shorter legacy of microplastic pollution.

Share this paper