0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Widespread microplastic pollution in Indiana, USA, rivers

River Research and Applications 2023 14 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers surveyed nine Indiana river watersheds and found microplastics in every single one, regardless of whether the surrounding land was urban, agricultural, or forested. Plastic fibers dominated across all sites, suggesting they arrive mainly via atmospheric deposition rather than runoff, which means even remote waterways are exposed. The findings indicate that rivers have a distinct microplastic profile compared to large lakes, and that flowing water ecosystems are pervasively contaminated throughout the midwestern United States.

Study Type Environmental

Abstract Microplastics (i.e., plastic particles <5 mm in size) are aquatic contaminants of emerging concern but are poorly quantified in flowing waters of the midwestern USA. Microplastics enter streams and rivers through a variety of pathways (e.g., wastewater effluent, breakdown of larger plastic debris, atmospheric deposition) and can potentially harm aquatic organisms through both direct consumption and indirect contamination from sorbed toxins. In this study, we quantified microplastic concentrations and types (i.e., beads, fibers, films, foams, fragments) in nine Indiana watersheds representing a gradient of dominant land use (i.e., agricultural, urban, and forested). We predicted that microplastic concentration would be higher in watersheds with higher percentages of urban and agricultural land use than in forested watersheds. Our results revealed measurable quantities of microplastics in samples from all watersheds, but microplastic concentration did not vary significantly with land use or longitudinally within watersheds. Fibers were the dominant form of microplastic at all sites, suggesting that fibers may be transported primarily through atmospheric deposition rather than via direct runoff from the surrounding landscape. We conclude that rivers have a different microplastic “signature” than large lakes, likely due to retention characteristics of flowing water ecosystems, unique microplastic sources, and a shorter legacy of microplastic pollution.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastic pollution in Indiana's White River : an exploratory study

AI summary Read the abstract

An exploratory study investigated microplastic pollution in Indiana's White River, extending research on freshwater microplastics to the Midwestern United States where relatively little data existed. The study documents microplastic presence in an inland river system far from the coast, underscoring that microplastic contamination is a widespread freshwater problem.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in 132 Iowa lakes and variability in relation to abiotic, biotic, and anthropogenic factors

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers surveyed microplastic concentrations across 132 lakes in Iowa, finding that microplastics were nearly ubiquitous even in rural, minimally developed lakes — though concentrations were higher in lakes near urban areas, agricultural land, and higher human population density. Fiber-type microplastics were most common, consistent with patterns seen globally. The broad survey across diverse lake types provides compelling evidence that microplastic contamination of freshwater lakes is widespread across the American Midwest, not limited to industrial or highly urbanized regions.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic Prevalence in 4 Oregon Rivers Along a Rural to Urban Gradient Applying a Cost-Effective Validation Technique

AI summary Read the abstract

Microplastics were found in all samples from four Oregon rivers spanning rural to urban settings, and microfiber abundance was correlated with human population within 5 km of sampling sites. The study demonstrates that even remote rural rivers carry measurable plastic pollution, underscoring the pervasive reach of microplastic contamination in freshwater systems.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic distribution and their abundance along rivers are determined by land uses and sediment granulometry

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers studied two river watersheds and found that microplastics were widespread in both water and sediment, with concentrations in water rising alongside increased urban land use. Interestingly, microplastics trapped in sediment were more influenced by the grain size of the riverbed than by human activity. The findings suggest that both human factors and natural river characteristics work together to shape where microplastics end up in freshwater systems.

Article Tier 2

Abundance, Distribution and Drivers of Microplastic Contaminant in Urban River Environments

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers surveyed microplastic distribution in urban river environments and identified key drivers of accumulation hotspots, finding that land use, hydrology, and infrastructure factors concentrated microplastics at predictable locations that could inform targeted management interventions.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper