0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

The Occurrence and Risk Assessment of Microplastics: different treatment technologies for wastewater treatment plants in Oman

AI summary Read the abstract

A study of three wastewater treatment plants in Oman — using conventional activated sludge, membrane bioreactor, and sequencing batch reactor technologies — quantified and characterized MPs at multiple treatment stages, including sludge. Membrane bioreactor technology achieved the best MP removal from effluent, but all plants concentrated MPs in sludge, highlighting an underregulated route for microplastic release back into the environment.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastics (MPs) are considered an emerging pollutant and one of the greatest challenges for many states and are a significant environmental concern that requires to be addressed. Municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are usually suspected of being major contributors to environmental MPs that can cause environmental disutility in distinct ways. The purpose of this study is to quantify and characterize MPs at different treatment technologies in major WWTPs in Oman as well as to mitigate human and environmental risks. Water samples were taken from three WWTPs; WWTP A (CAS), WWTP B (MBR), and WWTP C (SBR). Sampling points were Primary, tertiary effluent, and sludge (10L, 30L, and 2.5 L respectively). Water samples were then sieved in stainless sieves with a mesh size of 1 mm, 425 µm, 45 µm, and 1.2 µm. The samples then undergo wet peroxidation (WPO) to remove the organic matter pursued by density separation of inorganic matter. Suspected MPs were then counted under a light microscope and morphologically characterized into fibers, fragments, foams, spheres, and others. Detected MPs were then counted under a light microscope and morphologically characterized into fibers, fragments, foams, spheres, and others. Fiber MPs were dominant in all effluent types, followed by a considerable amount of fragments. Most detected MPs in tertiary effluent were small (< 425µm) and fibers in shape. Almost all shapes colors and several sizes of MPs were detected in the sludge sample which is considered the sink of microplastics. Nonetheless, diverse treatment stages are capable of removing a significant proportion of MPs, fiber MPs can effectively survive the studied treatment processes, including advanced treatment using ultrafiltration. The outcomes of this study show that a considerable number of microplastics are discharged into the environment through treated effluent and sludge. The application of on-site management advanced practices for microplastic remediation such as nanotechnology shall be recommended to the wastewater management authority in Oman..

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastics removal efficiency and risk analysis of wastewater treatment plants in Oman

AI summary Read the abstract

This study measured microplastic contamination at three wastewater treatment plants in Oman using different treatment technologies. The plants removed between 84% and 97% of microplastics, but significant amounts still escaped into the environment through treated water and sludge. The findings show that even modern wastewater treatment cannot fully prevent microplastics from reaching waterways that communities may use for irrigation or other purposes.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence of Microplastics in Waste Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison between Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Technologies

AI summary Read the abstract

Microplastics were compared in sludge from wastewater treatment plants using conventional activated sludge and membrane bioreactor technologies, finding that both produced sludge with significant plastic contamination and that the MBR system showed somewhat different microplastic profiles. The results indicate that sludge disposal is a key route by which microplastics captured in treatment plants are transferred to agricultural land.

Article Tier 2

Technologies for the Removal of Microplastics from Wastewater: A Short Review

AI summary Read the abstract

This review compares wastewater treatment technologies for removing microplastics, finding that membrane bioreactors and advanced filtration systems achieve the highest removal efficiencies (>95%) but that MPs accumulating in sludge may re-enter the environment through biosolid disposal. The analysis underscores that no current treatment system completely prevents MP discharge and that sludge management is a critical but underaddressed pathway to the environment.

Article Tier 2

Distribution and removal mechanism of microplastics in urban wastewater plants systems via different processes

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the microplastic removal efficiency of three wastewater treatment technologies and found that the anaerobic-anoxic-oxic process achieved the highest removal rate at 83.9%. Most microplastics were transferred to sludge during primary and secondary treatment stages, with dehydrated sludge containing significant concentrations. The study highlights that while wastewater treatment plants effectively intercept most microplastics, they also redistribute contamination to sludge, which may become a secondary pollution source.

Article Tier 2

Behavior and flow of microplastics during sludge treatment in Japan

AI summary Read the abstract

Sampling of two Osaka wastewater treatment plants found microplastics at every stage of the sludge treatment process, with 13 polymer types identified; concentration increased through dewatering, but the total MP load in final biosolids was lower than in raw sludge.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper