0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Kaolinite Deposition Dynamics and Streambed Clogging During Bedform Migration Under Losing and Gaining Flow Conditions

Water Resources Research 2023 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Shai Arnon, Shai Arnon, Shai Arnon, Tali Tadmor Shimony, Jonathan Dallmann, Shai Arnon, Jonathan Dallmann, Tali Tadmor Shimony, Edwin Saavedra Cifuentes, Shai Arnon, Yoni Teitelbaum, Shai Arnon, Yoni Teitelbaum, Yoni Teitelbaum, Yoni Teitelbaum, Yoni Teitelbaum, C. B. Phillips, C. B. Phillips, Shai Arnon, Shai Arnon, Shai Arnon, Shai Arnon, Yoni Teitelbaum, Yoni Teitelbaum, Yoni Teitelbaum, Edwin Saavedra Cifuentes, Aaron I. Packman Shai Arnon, Edwin Saavedra Cifuentes, Yoni Teitelbaum, Edwin Saavedra Cifuentes, Jonathan Dallmann, Jonathan Dallmann, Shai Arnon, Aaron I. Packman Shai Arnon, C. B. Phillips, C. B. Phillips, Aaron I. Packman Aaron I. Packman Aaron I. Packman Shai Arnon, Shai Arnon, Shai Arnon, Aaron I. Packman Aaron I. Packman Aaron I. Packman

Summary

This study investigated how clay particles deposit in sandy riverbeds and cause clogging under different flow conditions, affecting water exchange between rivers and groundwater. Streambed clogging has implications for aquatic habitat quality and the fate of microplastics that settle in river sediments.

Abstract Clogging of streambeds due to clay deposition influences the stream‐subsurface exchange flux and thus directly modulates hyporheic ecological and biogeochemical processes. Clogging of sandy streambeds has previously been studied under losing and gaining flows and during streambed movement, but not when these two flow conditions coincided. We conducted flume experiments to quantify the combined effect of moving bedforms and losing or gaining flows on kaolinite deposition and streambed clogging. The experiments were conducted by adding pulses of kaolinite in a flume packed with sand under a stream water velocity of 25 cm/s. We measured the deposition rates, dynamics of hyporheic exchange flux (HEF) and vertical hydraulic conductivity ( K v ), and the vertical distribution of kaolinite at the end of the experiments under two losing and two gaining flows (Darcy velocity of 10 and 20 cm/day). Kaolinite deposition led to clogging and reduction in K v and HEF under all flow conditions. Deposition occurred faster under losing flow conditions than under gaining flow conditions. However, the changes in K v and HEF were similar under losing and gaining flow conditions for similar kaolinite concentrations in the bed. Our results indicate that the deposition patterns of kaolinite were more influenced by bedform movement than by losing or gaining flow conditions, which is markedly different from the behavior observed under losing and gaining conditions for stationary bedforms. This implies that bedform morphodynamics control local‐scale clogging of sandy streambeds and should be accounted for when studying the hydrology of catchments at larger scales.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper