0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Parts per Million of Propanol and Arsine as Responsible for the Poisoning of the Propylene Polymerization Reaction

Polymers 2023 13 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Joaquín Hernández‐Fernández, Rafael González-Cuello, Rodrigo Ortega‐Toro

Summary

This paper is not about microplastics; it investigates how trace contaminants — specifically propanol and arsine — affect the catalytic polymerization of propylene to make polypropylene, measuring their impact on melt flow index and molecular weight of the final plastic product.

Polymers

Polypropylene synthesis is a critical process in the plastics industry, where control of catalytic activity is essential to ensure the quality and performance of the final product. In this study, the effect of two inhibitors, propanol and arsine, on the properties of synthesized polypropylene was investigated. Experiments were conducted using a conventional catalyst to polymerize propylene, and different concentrations of propanol and arsine were incorporated into the process. The results revealed that the addition of propanol led to a significant decrease in the Melt Flow Index (MFI) of the resulting polypropylene. The reduction in the MFI was most notable at a concentration of 62.33 ppm propanol, suggesting that propanol acts as an effective inhibitor by slowing down the polymerization rate and thus reducing the fluidity of the molten polypropylene. On the other hand, introducing arsine as an inhibitor increased the MFI of polypropylene. The maximum increase in the MFI was observed at a concentration of 0.035 ppm arsine. This suggests that small amounts of arsine affect the MFI and Mw of the produced PP. Regarding the catalyst productivity, it was found that as the concentration of propanol in the sample increased (approximately seven ppm), there was a decrease in productivity from 45 TM/kg to 44 TM/kg. Starting from 10 ppm, productivity continued to decline, reaching its lowest point at 52 ppm, with only 35 MT/kg. In the case of arsine, changes in catalyst productivity were observed at lower concentrations than with propanol. Starting from about 0.006 ppm, productivity decreased, reaching 39 MT/kg at a concentration of 0.024 ppm and further decreasing to 36 TM/kg with 0.0036 ppm. Computational analysis supported the experimental findings, indicating that arsine adsorbs more stably to the catalyst with an energy of -60.8 Kcal/mol, compared to propanol (-46.17 Kcal/mol) and isobutyl (-33.13 Kcal/mol). Analyses of HOMO and LUMO orbitals, as well as reactivity descriptors, such as electronegativity, chemical potential, and nucleophilicity, shed light on the potential interactions and chemical reactions involving inhibitors. Generated maps of molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) illustrated the charge distribution within the studied molecules, further contributing to the understanding of their reactivity. The computational results supported the experimental findings and provided additional information on the molecular interactions between the inhibitors and the catalyst, shedding light on the possible modes of inhibition. Solubles in xylene values indicate that both propanol and arsine affect the polymer's morphology, which may have significant implications for its properties and final applications.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Experimental Study of the Impact of Trace Amounts of Acetylene and Methylacetylene on the Synthesis, Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Polypropylene

Researchers found that trace amounts of acetylene and methylacetylene impurities in propylene feedstock affect polypropylene synthesis productivity and alter the mechanical and thermal properties of the resulting polymer, with implications for quality control in industrial plastic production.

Article Tier 2

Furan as Impurity in Green Ethylene and Its Effects on the Productivity of Random Ethylene–Propylene Copolymer Synthesis and Its Thermal and Mechanical Properties

Not relevant to microplastics — this paper studies how trace levels of furan impurity in bio-based ("green") ethylene affect the efficiency of ethylene-propylene copolymer synthesis and the resulting polymer's thermal and mechanical properties.

Article Tier 2

Assessment of Co-Pyrolysis of Polypropylene with Triacylglycerol-Based Waste Biomass to Obtain Sustainable Hydrocarbons

Despite its title referencing polypropylene co-pyrolysis, this paper studies the thermal breakdown of polypropylene plastic waste combined with biodiesel industry byproducts to produce renewable hydrocarbon fuels — not microplastic pollution. It examines chemical product yields from waste-to-fuel conversion, and is not relevant to microplastics or human health.

Article Tier 2

Polypropylene Contamination in Post-Consumer Polyolefin Waste: Characterisation, Consequences and Compatibilisation

Researchers characterized polypropylene contamination in post-consumer polyolefin plastic waste, finding that heterogeneous contaminants significantly compromise recycled material properties and examined compatibilisation strategies to improve recycling outcomes.

Article Tier 2

Theoretical–Experimental Study of the Action of Trace Amounts of Formaldehyde, Propionaldehyde, and Butyraldehyde as Inhibitors of the Ziegler–Natta Catalyst and the Synthesis of an Ethylene–Propylene Copolymer

This study used theoretical and experimental methods to characterize how trace amounts of aldehyde impurities including formaldehyde, propionaldehyde, and butyraldehyde act as inhibitors of Ziegler-Natta catalysts during ethylene-propylene copolymer synthesis, with implications for quality control in polyolefin production.

Share this paper