0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Human Health Effects Remediation Sign in to save

Identification of Biodegradable, Compostable or Toxic Plastic Bags with Two Beetles of the Tenebrionidae Family

Journal of Polymers and the Environment 2023 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Erik Saul Huidobro Medina, María Neftalí Rojas-Valencia, Denise Yeazul Fernández-Rojas, Juan Antonio Araiza-Aguilar

Summary

This study used mealworm larvae (Tenebrio molitor and Zophobas morio) as a biological test to distinguish between truly biodegradable compostable bags and conventional or oxo-degradable plastic bags. Larvae could degrade compostable and standard polyethylene bags at meaningful rates but barely degraded bags made with d2w additive technology, and the d2w bags caused 98% larval mortality — suggesting they contain toxic compounds. The results raise concerns about the safety and environmental claims of certain marketed "eco" plastic alternatives.

Abstract Various studies have demonstrated the environmental problems caused by plastic bags (PB) made with hydrocarbons, and therefore international policies have been established to replace the use of conventional PB by biobags or compostable bags, which are designed to be biodegradable and/or composted in the environment. However, the methods used to characterize such bags are still far from being effectively assessed. This study evaluated a technique to identify biodegradable, compostable and/or toxic PB by feeding compostable bags certified by recognized institutions to larvae of the Tenebrionidae family, particularly Tenebrio molitor and Zophobas morio species. Three brands of single-use bags were studied, and the following parameters were evaluated: rate of consumption (of bags by larvae), percentage of biomass (weight increase in larvae), percentage of survival (percentage of larvae eating bags), percentage of biodegradability by evaluating the total organic carbon (TOC) in stool, and stool analysis by spectroscopy and spectrometry. The results showed differences between the rate of consumption, the EHappy bag being the most consumed; there were differences in the percentage of biomass, the EHappy bag showing less potential for biomass increase; both species showed lower survival with the Ealternative bag. TOC evaluation indicated that the WCare bag presents the highest biodegradability; the total reflectance attenuated infrared analysis showed a decrease in the representative peaks of the spectrum of PB, evidencing biodegradation; and the amount of metals in feces was found within the Maximum Permissible Limits. The two species showed a good performance, demonstrating that they can be used as a suitable and viable tool to evaluate toxicity, biodegradability and compostability.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Biodegradation of polyethylene, biodegradable-polyethylene bags and corn residues using Tenebrio molitor larvae

Mealworm larvae (Tenebrio molitor) were fed three plastic types — standard low-density polyethylene (LDPE), compostable plastic (CPE), and oxo-degradable plastic with d2w additives — to test biodegradation. CPE degraded most readily (up to 98% with UV pre-treatment), LDPE degraded substantially (77%), but d2w plastic degraded barely at all (4%) and killed nearly all larvae. These results challenge the environmental claims of oxo-degradable plastics and suggest they may pose toxicity risks in natural ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

Biodegradation of polyethylene, biodegradable-polyethylene bags and corn residues using Tenebrio molitor larvae

This Spanish-language study tested the ability of mealworm larvae (Tenebrio molitor) to biodegrade different types of polyethylene plastic, including conventional LDPE and biodegradable varieties. The larvae could degrade all plastic types tested, suggesting insect-based digestion as a viable plastic waste management strategy.

Article Tier 2

Impacts of compostable and non-compostable plastic ingestion on Tenebrio molitor L. (Insecta: Tenebrionidae): a life history approach

Mealworm beetles (Tenebrio molitor) fed polyethylene, polystyrene, or compostable plastic during larval development showed reduced fitness compared to controls, with oil-derived plastics causing similar harm to compostable materials, suggesting compostable plastics are not inherently safer.

Article Tier 2

Biodegradation of various grades of polyethylene microplastics by Tenebrio molitor and Tenebrio obscurus larvae: Effects on their physiology

Mealworm larvae (Tenebrio molitor and Tenebrio obscurus) were fed different grades of polyethylene plastic to test their ability to biodegrade this common plastic. Both species could consume and partially break down all three types of polyethylene, though the process caused oxidative stress and shifted their gut bacteria. This research suggests biological degradation of plastic waste is possible, which could help reduce the environmental breakdown of plastics into harmful microplastics.

Article Tier 2

Biodegradation of polyvinyl chloride, polystyrene, and polylactic acid microplastics in Tenebrio molitor larvae: Physiological responses

Mealworms were fed three types of microplastics (PVC, polystyrene, and PLA) and successfully biodegraded all three, but with significant physiological costs including weight loss, reduced survival, and increased oxidative stress. PVC was the hardest to degrade and caused the most harm, while biodegradable PLA was the easiest and least damaging. The study shows that biological approaches to breaking down microplastics are possible but that certain plastic types generate toxic byproducts during the process.

Share this paper