0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Sustainable Assessment of the Environmental Activities of Major Cosmetics and Personal Care Companies

Sustainability 2023 11 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Hea Young Lim, Ki Han Kwon

Summary

This paper is not directly about microplastics; it assesses the environmental sustainability activities of major cosmetics and personal care companies, including OEM/ODM manufacturers and retailers, covering broad issues like climate change, waste, and water use.

The cosmetics and personal care industry has, by its nature, contributed to global environmental issues such as climate change, waste, water scarcity, habitat destruction, and water and air pollution. Therefore, it is more important than ever for the cosmetics and personal care companies to be responsible and proactive in addressing environmental issues. Meanwhile, the complexity of the cosmetics and personal care industry has never been greater. The roles of not only brand companies but also OEM/ODM and retail companies are becoming increasingly important, and the boundaries are also collapsing. Despite the urgency of environmental issues, there has been a lack of research on specific and practical environmental activities of cosmetics and personal care companies, and the environmental responsibilities of OEM/ODM companies and retailers have been overlooked. Therefore, the need for this study was recognized. The purpose of this study was to expand the scope of assessment to include not only cosmetics brand companies but also OEM/ODM companies and retailers in general to identify the actual and concrete environmental activities being carried out. Therefore, in this study, the keywords cosmetics, environmental, eco-friendly, and sustainable, which have recently become the topics of discussion, were empirically analyzed. This study selected and analyzed 18 out of 28 annual reports, nonfinancial statements, and sustainability reports of 16 cosmetics- and personal-care-related companies. In addition, 456 articles were found through PubMed, Google Scholar, Google, and Scopus, and the final 108 articles were referenced using the PRISMA flow chart. The novelty of this study is, first, in the fact that it identified the actual and specific strategies and practices of cosmetics and personal care companies with respect to environmental issues. Second, it established common standards for environmental issues and compared corporate environmental activities. Third, this study included OEM/ODM companies and retailers, whose influence has been increasing in recent years, to understand the status of eco-friendly activities across the industry. This study makes a practical contribution by encouraging environmental activities in the cosmetics industry through comparing and evaluating the specific and practical environmental activities of not only brand companies but also OEM/ODM companies and retailers and laying the foundation for the development of a framework for environmental assessment. In addition, this study recognizes the need to study the environmental activity behavior of the cosmetics industry as a whole and contributes to the study of cosmetics companies’ environmental activities by suggesting how to use companies’ nonfinancial performance reports as materials to assess their actual environmental activities.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Sustainability Schemes in the Cosmetic Industry: Scope, Credibility, and Value Chain Coverage

Despite its title referencing sustainability schemes in cosmetics, this paper studies the credibility and coverage of 24 eco-certification labels used in the cosmetics industry — not microplastic pollution. It examines gaps in lifecycle coverage and greenwashing risks within certification schemes and is not relevant to microplastics or human health.

Article Tier 2

An integrated approach to address the biodegradability of cosmetic formulations as part of a corporate sustainability strategy

Not relevant to microplastics — this paper describes a corporate sustainability framework for evaluating and improving the biodegradability of cosmetic product portfolios, helping companies prioritize reformulation of high-impact products and ingredients.

Article Tier 2

Towards Sustainable Cosmetics Packaging

Not directly relevant to microplastics — this review examines the broader sustainability challenges of cosmetics packaging, including environmental, social, and economic trade-offs, without a specific focus on microplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Sustentabilidade no processo produtivo da indústria cosmética: uma revisão da literatura

This systematic literature review examined sustainability practices in the cosmetics industry, including the growing concern over microplastic ingredients in cosmetic products. The review identified trends toward greener formulations, sustainable packaging, and consumer-driven pressure for environmental responsibility. The cosmetics sector is increasingly recognizing its environmental impact and exploring alternatives to synthetic microplastics.

Article Tier 2

Sustainability in the Cosmetics Industry: Environmental Impacts, Statistics, and Solutions

This literature review examined the environmental impacts of the cosmetics industry, focusing on chemical pollutants released during production, microplastic ingredients, and packaging waste. The study found that the cosmetics sector contributes substantially to environmental contamination and called for stronger sustainability standards.

Share this paper