0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Macroplastic fragmentation in rivers

Environment International 2023 50 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Anna Zielonka, Anna Zielonka, Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Maciej Liro, Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Anna Zielonka, Anna Zielonka, Anna Zielonka, Anna Zielonka, Anna Zielonka, Anna Zielonka, Anna Zielonka, Anna Zielonka, Anna Zielonka, Anna Zielonka, Anna Zielonka, Anna Zielonka, Anna Zielonka, Anna Zielonka, Maciej Liro, Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Anna Zielonka, Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Anna Zielonka, Anna Zielonka, Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Maciej Liro, Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Anna Zielonka, Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Anna Zielonka, Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik Tim van Emmerik

Summary

This paper presents a framework for understanding how larger plastic waste in rivers breaks down into microplastics and nanoplastics over time. The researchers identified key factors that control fragmentation, including the type of plastic, its shape, and river conditions like sunlight exposure and water flow. Understanding this process is important because rivers are a major pathway for microplastics to spread through the environment and eventually reach drinking water sources.

Study Type Environmental

The process of macroplastic (>0.5 cm) fragmentation results in the production of smaller plastic particles, which threaten biota and human health and are difficult to remove from the environment. The global coverage and long retention times of macroplastic waste in fluvial systems (ranging from years to centuries) create long-lasting and widespread potential for its fragmentation and the production of secondary micro- and nanoplastics. However, the pathways and rates of this process are mostly unknown and existing experimental data not fully informative, which constitutes a fundamental knowledge gap in our understanding of macroplastic fate in rivers and the transfer of produced microparticles throughout the environment. Here we present a conceptual framework which identifies two types of riverine macroplastic fragmentation controls: intrinsic (resulting from plastic item properties) and extrinsic (resulting from river characteristics and climate). First, based on the existing literature, we identify the intrinsic properties of macroplastic items that make them particularly prone to fragmentation (e.g., film shape, low polymer resistance, previous weathering). Second, we formulate a conceptual model showing how extrinsic controls can modulate the intensity of macroplastic fragmentation in perennial and intermittent rivers. Using this model, we hypothesize that the inundated parts of perennial river channels-as specific zones exposed to the constant transfer of water and sediments-provide particular conditions that accelerate the physical fragmentation of macroplastics resulting from their mechanical interactions with water, sediments, and riverbeds. The unvegetated areas in the non-inundated parts of perennial river channels provide conditions for biochemical fragmentation via photo-oxidation. In intermittent rivers, the whole channel zone is hypothesized to favor both the physical and biochemical fragmentation of macroplastics, with the dominance of the mechanical type during the periods with water flow. Our conceptualization aims to support future experimental and modelling works quantifying plastic footprint of different macroplastic waste in different types of rivers.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper