We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Spatial Characteristics and Driving Forces of the Water Footprint of Spring Maize Production in Northern China
Summary
Researchers calculated blue, grey, green, and total water footprints for spring maize production across Northeast China's provinces and municipalities in 2019 and 2020, using the water footprint methodology to evaluate water-use efficiency. They found grey water footprints dominated (accounting for roughly 50-55% of total), identified significant spatial variation driven by irrigation practices and precipitation, and analyzed the key drivers of regional differences in agricultural water consumption.
Using the water footprint (WF) approach to evaluate the water-use efficiency in agricultural production is crucial for assessing the sustainable use of water resources and mitigating water scarcity and pollution. This study calculated the blue, grey, green and total water footprints of spring maize production in Northeast China in 2019 and 2020 and compared the water footprint values at the provincial and municipal scales. In addition, this study analyzed the spatial variation and drivers of the water footprint. The results show that the average water footprints of spring maize production in Northeast China in 2019 and 2020 were 1.78 m3kg−1 and 2.00 m3kg−1, out of which the grey water footprint contributed the most, accounting for 55.19% and 49.85% of the total water footprint, respectively, while the blue water footprint contributed the least, accounting for only 17.44% and 18.68% of the total water footprint. At the provincial level, the water footprint of spring maize production in Northeast China was spatially clustered, with the lowest total water footprint in Heilongjiang Province and the highest total water footprint in Jilin Province. The spatial distribution difference of the spring maize unit yield was the fundamental factor explaining the difference in the water footprint. The precipitation, surface water resources, average temperature, effective irrigated area and the proportion of effective irrigated area also had impacts on the water footprint. This study provides a scientific basis for optimizing the distribution of spring maize production in Northeast China, formulating appropriate sustainable water resource management plans, improving water-use efficiency and realizing sustainable water resource management in Northeast China.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Quantification and Evaluation of Grey Water Footprint in Yantai
Researchers quantified grey water footprint — the freshwater volume needed to dilute pollutants to safe levels — in Yantai, China from 2014 to 2019, finding agricultural runoff was the dominant contributor and that overall footprint declined by 2019 following pollution control efforts.
Response of Matching Degree between Precipitation and Maize Water Requirement to Climate Change in China
This study examined how climate change is altering the matching between precipitation timing and maize water requirements across China's monsoon region. Changes in intra-annual precipitation distribution and extreme weather frequency were found to affect crop water availability, with significant implications for food security.
Energy budget and carbon footprint in a wheat and maize system under ridge furrow strategy in dry semi humid areas
This agricultural study compared the energy use and carbon footprint of wheat-maize farming systems using different irrigation and planting strategies in semi-arid China. The research has no direct relevance to microplastic research but informs sustainable farming practices that reduce overall environmental impact.
The role of grey water footprint in urban wastewater management: from pollution to reuse
This study evaluated grey water footprint as a qualitative indicator of wastewater impact using eight years of real data from a municipal treatment plant and its receiving water body, demonstrating its utility for tracking wastewater management effectiveness over time.
A Methodology for Industrial Water Footprint Assessment Using Energy-Water-Carbon Nexus
Researchers developed a methodology using the energy-water-carbon nexus to assess industrial water footprints, applying it to Irish milk and beer production facilities to quantify the carbon emissions associated with industrial water consumption and treatment.