We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comparative systematic review of low-cost adsorbents for fluoride and heavy metal removal in rural water supplies in South Africa (1 January 2000 – 30 June 2025)
Summary
This systematic review compared low-cost adsorbents derived from agricultural and natural materials for removing fluoride and heavy metals from drinking water in rural South Africa. While focused on traditional contaminants, the adsorption techniques reviewed are also applicable to emerging water treatment challenges including microplastic removal in resource-limited settings.
Introduction Access to safe drinking water remains a critical challenge in rural developing regions, including South Africa, where naturally occurring fluoride and anthropogenic heavy metals (Pb 2+ , Cd 2+ , As, Cr 6 + ) pose significant public health risks. Low-cost adsorbents derived from agricultural and natural materials have emerged as a promising solution for decentralized water treatment in resource-limited areas. Methods This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251084775). A total of 29 studies published between 2008 and 2025 were included. Eligible studies investigated the use of low-cost adsorbents—such as biochar, activated carbon, bone char, clay minerals, and agricultural residues—for the removal of fluoride and heavy metals from water sources. Key variables extracted included removal efficiency, adsorption capacity, operational conditions, and regeneration potential. Results Across the 29 studies, most adsorbents achieved removal efficiencies exceeding 90% for Pb 2+ , Cd 2+ , and Cr 6 + , with adsorption capacities ranging from 10 to >200 mg/g. Biochar and activated carbon demonstrated the highest performance, including superior regeneration potential, while agricultural by-products and clays contributed significant affordability and accessibility advantages. Approximately 40% of the included studies validated adsorbent performance using pilot- or field-scale testing, with slightly reduced but still effective removal compared to laboratory findings. Discussion/Conclusion Findings confirm that low-cost adsorbents offer practical, sustainable, and scalable treatment options for rural water contamination in South Africa. However, gaps remain in long-term regeneration, field durability, and treatment of emerging contaminants such as pharmaceuticals and microplastics. The review highlights the importance of context-specific, low‐cost technologies for advancing water security and supporting public health. Overall, the evidence promotes the adoption of locally sourced adsorbents as viable technologies for improving rural water supply management in South Africa. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD420251084775 , CRD420251084775
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
A Review on Pollutants Found in Drinking Water in Sub-Sahara African Rural Communities: Detection and Potential Low-cost Remediation Methods
This review examined drinking water pollutants in sub-Saharan African rural communities, identifying widespread contamination from microplastics, heavy metals, and pathogens, and evaluating low-cost remediation methods suitable for resource-limited settings.
Utilizing nature-based adsorbents for removal of microplastics and nanoplastics in controlled polluted aqueous systems: A systematic review of sources, properties, adsorption characteristics, and performance
This systematic review evaluates how natural materials like agricultural waste and plant-based substances can be used to filter microplastics and nanoplastics from water. The research shows that these nature-based solutions offer a sustainable and effective approach to reducing plastic particle contamination in drinking water and wastewater systems.
Emerging Contaminants and Their Removal from Aqueous Media Using Conventional/Non-Conventional Adsorbents: A Glance at the Relationship between Materials, Processes, and Technologies
This review covers various methods for removing emerging contaminants, including microplastics, from water using materials that absorb pollutants. Activated carbon remains the most effective option, but researchers are also developing cheaper alternatives from agricultural waste and nanomaterials. The work is important because better water treatment methods could reduce human exposure to microplastics and other harmful substances in drinking water.
Innovations in the Development of Promising Adsorbents for the Remediation of Microplastics and Nanoplastics – A Critical Review
This review evaluates innovative materials being developed to remove microplastics and nanoplastics from polluted water, including carbon-based, metal, polymer, and mineral adsorbents. Researchers compared the effectiveness, advantages, and limitations of each type, finding that adsorption-based approaches show strong promise. The study highlights remaining challenges such as scaling these technologies for real-world water treatment applications.
A brief review on utilizing natural adsorbents for microplastic removal from wastewater: A sustainable approach to environmental protection
Researchers reviewed natural materials like biochar, clay, algae, and agricultural waste as affordable alternatives to synthetic filters for removing microplastics from wastewater, finding some achieved over 80% removal efficiency in the lab, though scaling these methods to real-world treatment systems remains a significant challenge.