0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Hierarchy of Demographic and Social Determinants of Mental Health

2023 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jerzy Bala, Jennifer Jane Newson, Tara C. Thiagarajan

Summary

Not relevant to microplastics — this is an epidemiology study using machine learning to rank demographic and social predictors of mental health outcomes across 270,000 adults in 32 countries.

Models

Objectives:To understand the extent to which various demographic and social determinants predict mental wellbeing status and their relative hierarchy of predictive power in order to prioritize and develop population-based preventative approaches.Design:Cross-sectional analysis of survey data.Setting:Internet based survey from 32 countries across North America, Europe, Latin America, Middle East and North Africa, Sub Saharan Africa, South Asia and Australia.Participants:270,000 adults aged 18-85+ who participated in the Mental Health Million project.Primary and secondary outcome measures:We utilized 120+ demographic and social determinants to predict the aggregate mental health score of individuals (MHQ) and determine their relative predictive influence using various types of machine learning models including random forest, gradient boosting and logistic regression. The MHQ is derived from self-ratings of 47 mental health elements spanning ten disorders and provides a score that positions individuals along a spectrum from negative to positive mental health status that aligns with life impact and function criterion.Results:Classification models correctly identified 80% of those with a negative MHQ, while regression models predicted the specific MHQ score within ±15% of the position on the scale. Factors with the biggest predictive impact were young age followed by frequency of social interaction with friends, frequency of good sleep and physical exercise, and number of traumatic experiences. Age had twice the predictive power of social interaction which, in turn, was twice as important as the next four most important factors. Other predictive factors included sexual abuse, cyberbullying, and use of sleeping pills and sedatives.Conclusion:Social determinants of traumas and adversities and lifestyle can account for 60-70% of mental health challenges. However, additional factors are at play, particularly in younger age groups that are not included in this data and need further investigation.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Hierarchy of demographic and social determinants of mental health: analysis of cross-sectional survey data from the Global Mind Project

This large cross-sectional study analyzed data from the Global Mind Project to understand how social and demographic factors shape mental health outcomes. The researchers found that social determinants like trauma, adversity, and lifestyle account for 60-90% of mental health challenges. While not focused on microplastics, the findings are relevant because environmental pollution exposure is an emerging social determinant of health that may contribute to the unexplained portion of mental health challenges, especially in younger people.

Article Tier 2

Developing a translational research framework for MDD: combining biomolecular mechanisms with a spiraling risk factor model

This paper is not about microplastics. It develops a research framework for understanding major depressive disorder by combining biological mechanisms with risk factor models. This appears to be a false positive in the microplastics research database.

Article Tier 2

Effects of Microplastics on Mental Health

This review examines the emerging evidence linking microplastic exposure to mental health outcomes, discussing proposed mechanisms including neuroinflammation, gut-brain axis disruption, and endocrine interference from plastic-associated chemicals. The authors call for dedicated human cohort studies to establish whether environmental microplastic levels contribute to psychiatric or cognitive conditions.

Article Tier 2

A comparison of coupled microeconomic and mental health devastating alterations between low-income and affluent countries afflicted with COVID-19

This paper examines the economic and mental health impacts of COVID-19 in low-income versus high-income countries. It is not related to microplastics or environmental pollution.

Article Tier 2

Harmfulness Score: A Data‐Driven Framework for Ranking Environmental Risks of Microplastics

Researchers analyzed over 104,000 scientific abstracts on micro- and nanoplastics using bibliometric tools and machine learning to create a data-driven framework for ranking environmental risks. The resulting Harmfulness Score ranked polystyrene and polyethylene as the highest-risk polymers based on their association with oxidative stress, cytotoxicity, and genotoxicity in the scientific literature.

Share this paper