0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Revisiting the challenges of ozone depletion in Life Cycle Assessment

2023 3 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Anne van den Oever, Anne van den Oever, Stefano Puricelli, Nils Thonemann, Stefano Puricelli, Daniele Costa, Nils Thonemann, Daniele Costa, Nils Thonemann, Nils Thonemann, Nils Thonemann, Nils Thonemann, Nils Thonemann, Maeva Lavigne Philippot, Maeva Lavigne Philippot, Maarten Messagie Maarten Messagie

Summary

This review revisits the challenges of quantifying ozone depletion impacts in life cycle assessment (LCA), covering the interconnected effects of UV-B radiation on water quality, agriculture, human health, and biodiversity. The review highlights gaps in current LCA methods for capturing diverse environmental consequences of stratospheric ozone depletion.

Recent work has highlighted the interconnected impacts of stratospheric ozone depletion, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and climate change across various sectors, including water quality, agriculture, human health, and biodiversity. Increased UV-B exposure has diverse environmental impacts, including potential benefits like enhanced plant resistance and reduced vitamin D deficiency. However, quantification of these effects remains incomplete. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) serves to quantify environmental impacts of product systems. This review revisits challenges the related to ozone depletion in LCA. It is shown that the currently available LCA ozone depletion practices are unsuitable for supporting decision-making. The combined effects of outdated background databases and incomplete impact assessment methods must be further investigated. Collaboration with atmospheric scientists and expansion of substances covered by characterization models are required. The study emphasizes the need to address interlinkages between impact categories and recommends climate scenario-dependent characterization for robust decision-making in an uncertain world.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper