We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Contemporary challenges in face of nanotechnology regulatory gaps
Summary
This Brazilian review examines the regulatory gap between rapidly advancing nanotechnology and existing environmental legislation. The authors analyzed 21 scientific articles and found that while nanotechnology offers significant benefits for pollution remediation, potential risks remain poorly regulated, requiring stakeholder debate.
Nanotechnology has been developing rapidly and continuously, creating a gap between innovation and adequate regulation, which includes the possible risks of this technology. Seeking to raise questions and different positions with the theme, the present work aims to show several uses and implications (positive or negative) about the evaluation of the current panorama, seeking a debate to reach possible and viable solutions. In this context, the present work aims to develop a qualitative exploratory study using the analytical method on aspects of environmental legislation and nanotechnology. The inclusion criteria for this research were the selection of scientific articles published in the last 7 years (January 2015 to May 2022) using the Scopus index with the descriptors “legislation” AND “environment” AND “nanotechnology”, according to Boolean Logic. The exclusion criteria consisted of eliminating repeated articles and scientific articles found in book chapters, as well as those that deviated from the proposed theme. Thus, 60 scientific articles were found, and 39 were excluded after applying the exclusion criteria, leaving 21 articles for the preparation of this work. From the results found, it was verified the great potential that nanotechnology and nanomaterials can bring to society, such as the removal of pollutants and treatment of contaminated water, however, it is necessary to raise a debate between the interested parties, so that the possible risks are analyzed. and implications, being of paramount importance to create a regulatory framework to meet the needs that innovations in the field of nanotechnology bring.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Micro- and nanoplastics current status: legislation, gaps, limitations and socio-economic prospects for future
This review analyzes existing legislation on micro- and nanoplastic pollution across multiple countries and regions including Europe, North America, China, India, and Brazil. The study highlights significant regulatory gaps and recommends additional measures such as developing technologies for separating or degrading these particles in drinking water and wastewater.
Governance and Sandbox: Building Self-regulation Models for Nanotechnologies
Not relevant to microplastics research; this paper discusses governance frameworks and regulatory sandbox models for overseeing nanotechnologies, with no focus on microplastic pollution.
Nanomaterial's toxicity and its regulation strategies
This review examines the toxicity of nanomaterials used across biomedical, agricultural, and industrial applications, discussing how their unique physicochemical properties differ from bulk counterparts and evaluating regulatory strategies to manage risks to end-users and the environment.
Environmental considerations and current status of grouping and regulation of engineered nanomaterials
Researchers reviewed how engineered nanomaterials — particles smaller than 100 nanometers — are used in construction, water treatment, and coatings, examining how they are released into the environment across their lifecycle and highlighting the regulatory gaps in Europe's current chemical safety framework for these materials.
Regulatory landscape of nanotechnology and nanoplastics from a global perspective
This review examines the global regulatory landscape for nanotechnology and nanoplastics, noting that regulations have not kept pace with the rapid growth of nanomaterials in consumer products. There is no globally agreed-upon definition of nanoplastics, and safety testing guidelines are still catching up. As research increasingly links nanoplastics to health concerns, the lack of coordinated regulation means people may be exposed to materials whose risks are not yet fully understood.