0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Sign in to save

A DPSIR Framework to Evaluate and Predict the Development of Prefabricated Buildings: A Case Study

Sustainability 2023 12 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Fanrong Ji, Zhaoyuan Luo, Xiancun Hu, Yunquan Nan, Aifang Wei

Summary

This paper is not directly about microplastics — it applies the DPSIR (Drivers-Pressures-States-Impacts-Responses) framework combined with TOPSIS and grey prediction models to evaluate and forecast the development of prefabricated building construction in China's Shandong province.

Prefabricated building construction is an important method of enhancing construction productivity and promoting sustainable development in the construction industry. Evaluating and predicting the development performance of prefabricated buildings will contribute to identifying and implementing the most effective responses to promote prefabricated building technologies. Based on the Drives–Pressures–States–Impacts–Responses (DPSIR) framework, 14 evaluation indexes are determined to evaluate the development level of prefabricated buildings. The entropy weight method was used to determine the weight of the evaluation index, and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method with improved grey correlation was applied to comprehensively evaluate the trend of the index. The grey model (GM(1,1)) was developed to predict the development trend of prefabricated buildings. The development of prefabricated buildings in Shandong province, China, is employed as a case to apply the developed method and investigate development experiences. The results demonstrate that the case has achieved significant progress and has great potential in promoting the use of prefabricated buildings. The development recommendations include developing a policy and regulation system, strengthening a prefabricated building talent pool, and enhancing the investment in technological innovation. This study innovatively formulated the evaluation and prediction system based on the DPSIR, TOPSIS and GM(1,1) models, which could be used for evaluating development performance between social and environmental factors among various cause-effect relationships.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Evaluation of Sustainable Development of an Agricultural Economy Based on the DPSIR Model

This study applied the DPSIR (Drivers-Pressures-State-Impacts-Responses) model to evaluate the sustainable development of the agricultural economy in China. The analysis identified economic growth pressures and environmental degradation as interconnected challenges. Frameworks like DPSIR help policymakers design responses that address root causes of agricultural pollution, including plastic mulch use.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics: An analysis using the DPSIR (Drivers, Pressures, State, Impacts, Responses) model: The situation of Brazil

This review applies the DPSIR (Drivers, Pressures, State, Impacts, Responses) framework to analyze microplastic pollution specifically in the Brazilian context, structuring available evidence on sources, environmental accumulation, ecological and human health impacts, and current policy and technological response measures. The authors aim to provide a structured evidence base to guide large-scale solutions to microplastic pollution in Brazil.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in the environment: A DPSIR analysis with focus on the responses

This review applies a DPSIR (driving forces, pressures, states, impacts, responses) framework to organise current knowledge on microplastic pollution, covering sources, distribution across environmental compartments, and socio-economic impacts. The authors assess available response strategies including regulatory instruments, biodegradable plastics development, wastewater treatment, and environmental cleanup, while identifying key gaps in the literature.

Article Tier 2

The Marine Plastic Litter Issue: A Social-Economic Analysis

Using the DPSIR framework, this study analyzed marine plastic litter pollution as a social-economic issue, finding that fewer than 10 peer-reviewed studies had applied this policy-relevant analytical model to ocean plastics, and identifying management response gaps in food security, transport, and shelter contexts.

Article Tier 2

Study on China’s Plastic Consumption Trend and Sustainable Development Countermeasures

Despite its title referencing plastic consumption, this paper focuses on forecasting China's future plastic demand and proposing policy frameworks for the plastics industry — not on microplastic pollution or health effects. It examines production trends, packaging, construction, and automotive sectors, and is a policy and economics paper rather than a microplastics science paper.

Share this paper