We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
British and Irish newspapers implicitly support single-use masks over reusable face coverings
Summary
This paper is not directly about microplastics in the scientific sense — it analyzes how British and Irish newspapers framed single-use face masks versus reusable coverings during the COVID-19 pandemic, finding an implicit media bias toward single-use masks despite their greater environmental cost.
Introduction The environmental impact of waste caused by single-use masks or face coverings is an under-considered effect associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. The combination of the protective purpose of face masks and their potential environmental impacts through littering or waste management means the wearing of face masks is simultaneously associated with the health crisis and creation of a new environmental challenge, combining two strands of journalism. Methods Our study demonstrates how the discourse in British and Irish newspapers in the March 2020-December 2021 time frame relates to this problem. By a combination of quantitative and qualitative discourse analysis, we identify concepts commonly associated with the terms “face-covering” and “mask,” particularly concerning whether they refer to a disposable or reusable item. Results Results suggest that the newspaper discourse generally favored references to single-use surgical masks. Newspapers reported on the environmental impact of face masks only in very limited ways. Discussion We propose that the increase in waste caused by face masks can be related to prevailing representations of single-use surgical masks and limited attention paid to environmental concerns.
Sign in to start a discussion.