0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Soil protists are more resilient to the combined effect of microplastics and heavy metals than bacterial communities

The Science of The Total Environment 2023 15 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Lu Ma, Lin Zhang, Siyi Zhang, Min Zhou, Wei Huang, Xinyue Zou, Zhili He, Longfei Shu

Summary

Researchers compared how soil protists and bacteria respond to combined exposure to microplastics and copper contamination. They found that bacterial communities were immediately affected by copper alone, while protist communities showed a delayed response that only appeared under combined pollution. The study suggests that soil protists are more resilient to mixed microplastic and heavy metal contamination than bacteria, but the combination still disrupts important ecological interactions like predation.

Heavy metals and micro-/nanoplastic pollution seriously threaten the environment and ecosystems. While many studies investigated their effects on diverse microbes, few studies have focused on soil protists, and it is unclear how soil protists respond to the combined effect of micro-/nanoplastics and heavy metals. This study investigated how soil protistan and bacterial communities respond to single or combined copper and micro-/nanoplastics. The bacterial community exhibited an instantaneous response to single copper pollution, whereas the combined pollution resulted in a hysteresis effect on the protistan community. Single and combined pollution inhibited the predation of protists and changed the construction of ecological networks. Though single and combined pollution did not significantly affect the overall community structure, the exposure experiment indicated that combined pollution harmed soil amoeba's fitness. These findings offer valuable new insights into the toxic effects of single and combined pollution of copper and plastics on soil protistan and bacterial communities. Additionally, this study shows that sequencing-based analyses cannot fully reflect pollutants' adverse effects, and both culture-independent and dependent methods are needed to reveal the impact of pollutants on soil microbes.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in heavy metal-contaminated soil drives bacterial community and metabolic changes

Researchers found that adding common microplastics to soil already contaminated with heavy metals significantly changed the bacterial communities and their metabolic processes. The microplastics increased competition among bacteria and shifted how they process energy, while Proteobacteria became more abundant as a stress response. This matters because when microplastics and heavy metals combine in agricultural soil, they may disrupt the microbial ecosystems that keep soil healthy for growing food.

Article Tier 2

Effects of nano- or microplastic exposure combined with arsenic on soil bacterial, fungal, and protistan communities

Researchers studied the combined and individual effects of arsenic and micro- or nanoplastics on soil bacterial, fungal, and protistan communities. The study found that combined pollution distinctly altered the composition of these microbial communities, with protistan communities being particularly sensitive, indicating that the co-occurrence of plastics and heavy metals in soil may have compounding ecological effects.

Article Tier 2

Earthworms alleviate microplastics stress on soil microbial and protist communities

Researchers found that earthworms can help alleviate the negative effects of microplastic pollution on soil microbial and protist communities. In microcosm experiments, soils with earthworms showed more resilient bacterial, fungal, and protist communities when exposed to both conventional and biodegradable microplastics. The study suggests that soil macrofauna play an important role in buffering ecosystems against the disruptive effects of microplastic contamination.

Article Tier 2

Soil microplastics pollution can reduce viral abundance and have less consistent impacts on bacteria

Researchers exposed soils containing natural microbial communities to polyethylene and PVC microplastics and found that both types consistently reduced viral abundance, while effects on bacteria were more variable, suggesting microplastic pollution may alter the balance of microbial communities that regulate soil processes.

Article Tier 2

Microbiome predators in changing soils

Not relevant to microplastics — this review examines the role of predatory microorganisms (such as protists and bacteriophages) in shaping soil microbial communities and soil health under global change conditions.

Share this paper