We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Multi-step processing of replication stress-derived nascent strand DNA gaps by MRE11 and EXO1 nucleases
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that gaps in newly copied DNA — a form of replication stress — are processed by two enzymes into double-strand breaks, which are among the most dangerous forms of DNA damage. Critically, common plastic-related chemicals BPA and DEHP were shown to trigger this same DNA-damaging process, linking everyday plastic exposure to genomic instability.
Accumulation of single stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps in the nascent strand during DNA replication has been associated with cytotoxicity and hypersensitivity to genotoxic stress, particularly upon inactivation of the BRCA tumor suppressor pathway. However, how ssDNA gaps contribute to genotoxicity is not well understood. Here, we describe a multi-step nucleolytic processing of replication stress-induced ssDNA gaps which converts them into cytotoxic double stranded DNA breaks (DSBs). We show that ssDNA gaps are extended bidirectionally by MRE11 in the 3'-5' direction and by EXO1 in the 5'-3' direction, in a process which is suppressed by the BRCA pathway. Subsequently, the parental strand at the ssDNA gap is cleaved by the MRE11 endonuclease generating a double strand break. We also show that exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) and diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP), which are widespread environmental contaminants due to their use in plastics manufacturing, causes nascent strand ssDNA gaps during replication. These gaps are processed through the same mechanism described above to generate DSBs. Our work sheds light on both the relevance of ssDNA gaps as major determinants of genomic instability, as well as the mechanism through which they are processed to generate genomic instability and cytotoxicity.
More Papers Like This
Genotoxicity and Genomic Instability Induced by Micro- and Nanoplastics: A Comprehensive Multi-Taxa Mechanistic Review.
AI summary Read the abstract
This review of existing research found that tiny plastic particles (microplastics and nanoplastics) can damage DNA in many different living things, from fish to human cells. The plastic particles cause this damage by creating harmful molecules called free radicals, disrupting the body's ability to repair DNA, and triggering inflammation. These findings suggest that the growing amount of plastic pollution in our environment could pose serious health risks to humans and wildlife.
Novel insights into the role of bisphenol A (BPA) in genomic instability
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines how bisphenol A (BPA), a chemical widely used in polycarbonate and PVC plastics, contributes to genomic instability beyond its well-known effects as an endocrine disruptor. Researchers found evidence that BPA can damage DNA, disrupt cell division, and interfere with DNA repair mechanisms. The findings suggest that BPA exposure may play a role in promoting the kind of genetic damage that can lead to serious cellular dysfunction.
Nanoplastic-mediated non-B DNA mutagenicity
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists discovered that tiny plastic particles (nanoplastics) can directly damage DNA by physically warping its normal shape, causing mutations in bacteria, not just through general cell stress like previously thought, but through direct contact with our genetic material. While this study was done in bacteria, it raises important questions about whether the nanoplastics we're increasingly exposed to through food, water, and air could similarly affect human DNA and contribute to long-term health risks like cancer-linked mutations.
Effects of Micro‐ and Nanoplastics on Human Genome
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines the emerging evidence on how micro- and nanoplastics may interact with human genetic material, including potential effects on DNA integrity and gene expression. Researchers surveyed laboratory studies showing that these particles can induce oxidative stress and inflammatory responses in human cells, which are known pathways for genetic damage. The study highlights significant knowledge gaps and calls for more research into the long-term genomic effects of chronic microplastic exposure.
Bioeffects of Nanoplastics: DNA Damage and Mechanism
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines how nanoplastics, plastic particles smaller than one micrometer, can damage DNA in cells. The authors explain that nanoplastics may cause genetic damage through oxidative stress, inflammation, and direct interference with cellular processes, which raises concerns about potential long-term health effects including cancer risk.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.