0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Live soil ameliorated the negative effects of biodegradable but not non-biodegradable microplastics on the growth of plant communities

2023 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Yanmei Fu, Ayub M. O. Oduor, Ming Jiang, Yanjie Liu

Summary

Researchers conducted a greenhouse experiment with six plant communities and five biodegradable and non-biodegradable microplastic treatments to compare their effects on plant community productivity and diversity, with and without live soil biota. Results showed live soil ameliorated the negative effects of biodegradable but not non-biodegradable microplastics on plant growth, demonstrating that soil biota mediate microplastic impacts in type-dependent ways.

Abstract Plastic pollution has become a global environmental problem. Alternative use of biodegradable plastics has been proposed to mitigate the pollution problem caused by the traditional non-biodegradable plastics but the relative impacts of both types of microplastics on plant community productivity and diversity remain unknown. Microplastics can affect growth of individual plants directly by altering plant physiological processes and indirectly by altering soil biota that in turn influence plant growth. However, it remains unknown whether soil biota can mediate impact of biodegradable and non-biodegradable microplastics on plant community productivity and diversity due to a lack of studies on the topic. Here, we performed a greenhouse experiment with six plant communities and five biodegradable and five non-biodegradable microplastics to test whether: 1) biodegradable microplastics have a less negative effect on plant community biomass production and diversity than non-biodegradable microplastics, and 2) soil microorganisms differentially mediate the effects of non-biodegradable and biodegradable microplastics on plant community biomass production and diversity. We employed a fully crossed factorial design to grow the six plant communities in the presence vs . absence of the 10 microplastics individually and in live soil vs . sterilized soil. Results show that live soil ameliorated the negative effects of biodegradable microplastics on shoot biomass of the plant communities, but microplastics suppressed plant community diversity more strongly in live soil than in sterilized soil regardless of microplastics types under averaged across all treatments. Furthermore, the specific microplastics polymers were the main drivers of these results. Synthesis and applications: Overall, our findings indicate that even biodegradable microplastics, e.g. PBS, which are considered environmentally friendly, still pose significant ecological risks to the structure and productivity of plant communities with potential implications for functioning of terrestrial ecosystems. Future studies may identify the specific taxa of soil microorganisms that may have degraded the microplastics that we studied, their rates of biodegradation, and the effects thereof on plant community structure and productivity under more natural field conditions in contrasting climatic conditions.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Soil biota modulate the effects of microplastics on biomass and diversity of plant communities

Researchers used mesocosm experiments with natural soil biota to compare the effects of biodegradable and non-biodegradable microplastics on plant community biomass and diversity. Soil biota modulated the impact of microplastics, with biodegradable plastics showing similar effects to conventional plastics on plant community structure, challenging the assumption that biodegradable alternatives are environmentally benign.

Article Tier 2

Soil microorganisms play an important role in the detrimental impact of biodegradable microplastics on plants

Researchers found that biodegradable microplastics harmed vegetable crop growth by disrupting the soil microbial community rather than through direct contact with the plants. When soil microorganisms were suppressed, the negative effects of the biodegradable microplastics on plant growth were also reduced. The study suggests that soil bacteria and fungi play a key role in mediating the harmful impacts of biodegradable plastics on agricultural crops.

Article Tier 2

Differential responses of soil microbial community structure and function to conventional and biodegradable microplastics

Scientists compared how tiny pieces of regular plastics and "biodegradable" plastics affect helpful bacteria in soil after 6 months. They found that biodegradable plastics actually disrupted soil bacteria more than regular plastics, changing the microbes that help plants grow and cycle nutrients. This matters because these soil bacteria are crucial for growing healthy food, so switching to biodegradable plastics might not be the simple environmental solution we hoped for.

Article Tier 2

Legacy effect of microplastics on plant–soil feedbacks

Researchers examined the legacy effects of microplastic contamination on plant-soil feedbacks using soil previously conditioned with various microplastic types, finding that residual microplastics altered soil microbial communities and nutrient cycling in ways that affected subsequent plant growth.

Article Tier 2

Succession of soil bacterial communities and network patterns in response to conventional and biodegradable microplastics: A microcosmic study in Mollisol

Using a soil microcosm experiment, researchers compared how conventional polyethylene and biodegradable microplastics affected soil bacterial communities over 90 days across four dosages. Biodegradable microplastics induced greater community dissimilarity from controls and tended to enrich environmentally beneficial taxa, while conventional polyethylene promoted potentially hazardous bacteria.

Share this paper