We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Communicating the best available science to inform Antarctic policy and management: a practical introduction for researchers
Summary
This practical introduction reviewed how scientists can communicate research findings at the Antarctic Treaty System's science-policy interface, offering guidance for early-career researchers on translating Antarctic and Southern Ocean science into formats useful for policy decision-makers.
Abstract Communication at the science-policy interface can be bewildering not only for early-career researchers, but also for many within the research community. In the context of Antarctica and the Southern Ocean, decision-makers operating within the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) aspire to use the best available science as a basis for their decision-making. Therefore, to maximize the impact of Antarctic Treaty Parties' substantial investment in southern polar research, researchers wishing to contribute to policy and management must understand 1) how their work relates to and can potentially inform Antarctic and/or global policy and 2) the available mechanisms by which their research can be communicated to decision-makers. Recognizing these needs, we describe the main legal instruments relevant to Antarctic governance (primarily the ATS) and the associated meetings and stakeholders that contribute to policy development for the region. We highlight effective mechanisms by which Antarctic researchers may communicate their science into the policy realm, including through National Delegations or the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR), and we detail the key contemporary topics of interest to decision-makers, including those issues where further research is needed. Finally, we describe challenges at the Antarctic science-policy interface that may potentially slow or halt policy development.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Informing the Plastic Treaty negotiations on science - experiences from the Scientists’ Coalition for an Effective Plastic Treaty
Researchers from the Scientists' Coalition for an Effective Plastic Treaty describe how the scientific community self-organized to provide evidence-based input into United Nations negotiations for a global plastics treaty. The paper documents five communication strategies used to translate complex science into actionable guidance for policymakers, offering a model for future science-policy engagement.
Perspectives From the Science-Policy Interface in Animal Health and Welfare
This paper reviews best practices for scientists working at the science-policy interface in animal health and welfare, emphasizing the need for policy relevance, stakeholder engagement, and effective communication. These lessons apply broadly to microplastic researchers seeking to translate scientific findings into regulatory action.
“I Won’t Use the Term Dumbing It Down, but You Have to Take the Scientific Jargon Out”: A Qualitative Study of Environmental Health Partners’ Communication Practices and Needs
Researchers documented science communication practices and needs among stakeholder partners of the NIEHS-funded Oceans and Human Health and Climate Change Interactions project, finding that effective research translation requires active community engagement and collaborative knowledge-sharing to support water resources management decisions.
Plastic debris and policy: Using current scientific understanding to invoke positive change
This review examines how scientific evidence on sources, fate, and effects of plastic debris has informed and continues to inform policy responses, highlighting successful examples of science-to-policy translation and discussing opportunities to strengthen those linkages for more effective mitigation.
Building university-based boundary organisations that facilitate impacts on environmental policy and practice
This paper evaluates how universities can create boundary organizations that effectively translate environmental science into policy and practice. Getting research findings about plastic pollution and microplastics into policy decisions requires these kinds of institutional bridges between academia and government.