0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Remediation Sign in to save

Performance of sewage sludge treatment for the removal of antibiotic resistance genes: Status and prospects

The Science of The Total Environment 2023 38 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Shiyu Yin, Shiyu Yin, Shu-Hong Gao, Le Gao, Shiyu Yin, Xu Zhou Shu-Hong Gao, Xiumin Fan, Zhongqi He, Zhongqi He, Qilin Wang, Xiumin Fan, Wenbiao Jin, Qilin Wang, Zhongqi He, Shu-Hong Gao, Qilin Wang, Xu Zhou Qilin Wang, Shiyu Yin, Qilin Wang, Shiyu Yin, Xu Zhou Shu-Hong Gao, Xu Zhou Qilin Wang, Wenbiao Jin, Zhongqi He, Zhongqi He, Wenbiao Jin, Wenbiao Jin, Qilin Wang, Shu-Hong Gao, Zhongqi He, Xu Zhou Wenbiao Jin, Xu Zhou Qilin Wang, Qilin Wang, Qilin Wang, Qilin Wang, Shu-Hong Gao, Qilin Wang, Qilin Wang, Qilin Wang, Qilin Wang, Shu-Hong Gao, Zhongqi He, Xu Zhou

Summary

This review examines how sewage sludge treatment methods affect antibiotic resistance genes, which can spread from treated sludge into soil and water when the sludge is used as fertilizer. Microplastics and heavy metals present in sludge make it harder to eliminate these resistance genes during treatment. This is a human health concern because spreading treated sludge on farmland could introduce drug-resistant bacteria into the food chain and environment.

Study Type Environmental

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) receive wastewater containing antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs), which are predominant contributors to environmental pollution in water and soil. Of these sources, sludge is a more significant contributor than effluent. Knowing how sludge treatment affects the fate of ARGs is vital for managing the risk of these genes in both human and natural environments. This review therefore discusses the sources and transmission of ARGs in the environment and highlights the risks of ARGs in sludge. The effects of co-existing constituents (heavy metals, microplastics, etc.) on sludge and ARGs during treatment are collated to highlight the difficulty of treating sludge with complex constituents in ARGs. The effects of various sludge treatment methods on the abundances of ARGs in sludge and in soil from land application of treated sludge are discussed, pointing out that the choice of sludge treatment method should take into account various potential factors, such as soil and soil biology in subsequent land application. This review offers significant insights and explores the abundances of ARGs throughout the process of sludge treatment and disposal. Unintentional addition of antibiotic residues, heavy metals, microplastics and organic matter in sludge could significantly increase the abundance and reduce the removal efficiency of ARGs during treatment, which undoubtedly adds a barrier to the removal of ARGs from sludge treatment. The complexity of the sludge composition and the diversities of ARGs have led to the fact that no effective sludge treatment method has so far been able to completely eliminate the ecological risk of ARGs. In order to reduce risks resulting by transmission of ARGs, technical and management measures need to be implemented.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper