0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Analytical challenges in detecting microplastics and nanoplastics in soil-plant systems

Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 2023 32 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 70 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Imran Azeem, Muhammad Arslan Ahmad, Imran Azeem, Imran Azeem, Imran Azeem, Imran Azeem, Imran Azeem, Muhammad Adeel, Noman Shakoor, Noman Shakoor, Muhammad Adeel, Muhammad Adeel, Muhammad Adeel, Muhammad Adeel, Muhammad Adeel, Sadaf Chaudhary, Muhammad Arslan Ahmad, Muhammad Zain, Muhammad Arslan Ahmad, Muhammad Arslan Ahmad, Muhammad Arslan Ahmad, Muhammad Arslan Ahmad, Noman Shakoor, Sadaf Chaudhary, Muhammad Adeel, Ming Xu, Ming Xu, Noman Shakoor, Noman Shakoor, Noman Shakoor, Noman Shakoor, Muhammad Adeel, Adnan Khan, Muhammad Zain, Muhammad Zain, Ming Xu, Ming Xu, Muhammad Zain, Muhammad Zain, Yukui Rui, Muhammad Adeel, Muhammad Zain, Muhammad Adeel, Adnan Khan, Ming Xu, Muhammad Arslan Ahmad, Ming Xu, Yuanbo Li, Yuanbo Li, Guikai Zhu, Guikai Zhu, Muhammad Adeel, Syed Aizaz Ali Shah, Yukui Rui, Yukui Rui, Kashif Khan, Guikai Zhu, Ming Xu, Guikai Zhu, Ming Xu, Adnan Khan, Ming Xu, Yukui Rui, Yukui Rui, Yukui Rui, Ming Xu, Yukui Rui, Yukui Rui, Yukui Rui

Summary

This systematic review found that no universal, efficient, or cost-effective analytical method exists for detecting microplastics and nanoplastics in soil and plant samples, identifying this as the primary barrier to understanding plastic contamination in food systems. Current techniques like Py-GC/MS and vibrational spectroscopy each have significant limitations, especially for the smallest nanoplastic fractions that may pose the greatest health risks.

Study Type Review

Microplastics (MPx) and nanoplastics (NPx) are increasingly accumulating in terrestrial ecosystems, heightening concerns about their potential adverse effects on human health via the food chain. Techniques aimed at recovering the most challenging colloidal fractions of MPx and NPx, especially for analytical purposes, are limited. This systematic review emphasises the absence of a universal, efficient, and cost-effective analytical method as the primary hindrance to studying MPx and NPx in soil and plant samples. The study reveals that several methods, including density separation, organic matter removal, and filtration, are utilized to detect MPx or NPx in soil through vibrational spectroscopy and visual identification. Instruments such as Pyrolysis Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (Py-GCMS), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy, and fluorescence microscopy are employed to identify MPx and NPx in plant tissue. In extraction procedures, organic solvents and sonication are used to isolate NPx from plant tissues, while Pyrolysis GC-MS quantifies the plastics. SEM and TEM serve to observe and characterize NPx within plant tissues. Additionally, FTIR and fluorescence microscopy are utilized to identify polymers of MPx and NPx based on their spectral characteristics and fluorescence signals. The findings from this review clarify the identification and quantification methods for MPx and NPx in soil and plant systems and provide a comprehensive methodology for assessing MPx/NPx in the environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper