0
Article Tier 2 Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Protecting public health and the environment: towards a general ban on cellulose acetate cigarette filters in the European Union

Frontiers in Public Health 2023 5 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper reviewed evidence on cellulose acetate cigarette filters, finding that they encourage smoking, are inhaled more deeply, and are a significant source of persistent plastic pollution, supporting calls for a general ban on cellulose acetate filters.

Body Systems

After the establishment of a causal relationship between tobacco use and cancer in the 1950s, cellulose acetate filters were introduced with the claim to reduce the adverse health impact of unfiltered cigarettes. Often perceived to be more pleasant and healthy, filters encouraged smoking. However, filtered cigarettes are more deeply inhaled to obtain the same nicotine demand while altered combustion releases more tobacco-specific nitrosamines. The increasing use of cigarette filter ventilation is associated with a sharp rise in lung adenocarcinomas in recent decades. While not preventing adverse health effects, a global environmental problem has been created due to the non-biodegradable filter litter, causing ecotoxicological effects and the spread of microplastics. Recently, the Belgian Superior Health Council advised policymakers to ban cigarette filters as single-use plastics at both national and European levels. This article outlines the arguments used to justify this plea (human health and environment), the expected effects of a filter ban, as well as the public reception and reactions of the tobacco industry. The specific context of the European Union is discussed including the revision of the Single-Use Plastics Directive, affording a new opportunity to ban plastic filters. This perspective article aims to fuel the momentum and cooperation among member states for this purpose.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Cellulose acetate cigarette filter is hazardous to human health

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed evidence on whether cellulose acetate cigarette filters provide any protective health benefit and their environmental impact as plastic waste. The study found persistent concerns that filters offer limited health protection while contributing significantly to environmental pollution, as discarded cigarette butts made from this plant-based plastic are a major source of toxic litter.

Article Tier 2

Time to kick the butt of the most common litter item in the world: Ban cigarette filters

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers argue that cigarette filters, made of cellulose acetate single-use plastic, offer no public health benefit while being the most littered item globally and a significant source of microplastics, toxic chemical leaching, and ecological harm.

Clinical Trial Tier 1

Nitrosamine and nicotine exposure after switching from filtered to unfiltered cigarette smoking: a cross-over clinical trial.

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted a randomized cross-over trial in 29 smokers switching between filtered and unfiltered cigarettes and found no significant difference in urinary cotinine or NNAL nitrosamine biomarkers, suggesting that banning cellulose acetate filters—the most common plastic litter item—would reduce environmental microplastic pollution without meaningfully increasing health risk to smokers.

Article Tier 2

Fate of nanoplastics in the environment: Implication of the cigarette butts

AI summary Read the abstract

This study investigated cigarette butts as an underrecognized source of nanoplastic pollution, finding that cellulose acetate filters can fragment into nanoscale particles that disperse in the environment. Given the enormous volume of cigarette litter worldwide, butts may represent a significant and overlooked nanoplastic pathway.

Article Tier 2

Banning cigarette filters in the United Kingdom: Time to correct misperceptions of harms

AI summary Read the abstract

This commentary argued that the UK Government should use powers under the Tobacco and Vapes Bill to ban cigarette filters, as only a quarter of UK adults correctly understand that filters do not reduce smoking harms. Banning filters would benefit both public health and the environment by eliminating a major source of cellulose acetate microplastic pollution.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper