0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Bioremediation of contaminated soil and groundwater by in situ biostimulation

Frontiers in Microbiology 2023 74 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Martin Romantschuk, Katariina Lahti-Leikas, Merja H. Kontro, Aki Sinkkonen Merja H. Kontro, Martin Romantschuk, Polina Galitskaya, Harri Talvenmäki, Suvi Simpanen, Suvi Simpanen, Martin Romantschuk, Martin Romantschuk, John Allen, Martin Romantschuk, Aki Sinkkonen

Summary

This review examines in situ biostimulation, a technique that encourages naturally occurring soil microbes to break down contaminants without excavating polluted soil. Researchers found that while many bioremediation methods show promise in lab settings, their success in real-world field conditions is highly variable. The study emphasizes that methods must be validated under site-specific conditions and that local expertise is essential for successful implementation.

Bioremediation by <i>in situ</i> biostimulation is an attractive alternative to excavation of contaminated soil. Many <i>in situ</i> remediation methods have been tested with some success; however, due to highly variable results in realistic field conditions, they have not been implemented as widely as they might deserve. To ensure success, methods should be validated under site-analogous conditions before full scale use, which requires expertise and local knowledge by the implementers. The focus here is on indigenous microbial degraders and evaluation of their performance. Identifying and removing biodegradation bottlenecks for degradation of organic pollutants is essential. Limiting factors commonly include: lack of oxygen or alternative electron acceptors, low temperature, and lack of essential nutrients. Additional factors: the bioavailability of the contaminating compound, pH, distribution of the contaminant, and soil structure and moisture, and in some cases, lack of degradation potential which may be amended with bioaugmentation. Methods to remove these bottlenecks are discussed. Implementers should also be prepared to combine methods or use them in sequence. Chemical/physical means may be used to enhance biostimulation. The review also suggests tools for assessing sustainability, life cycle assessment, and risk assessment. To help entrepreneurs, decision makers, and methods developers in the future, we suggest founding a database for otherwise seldom reported unsuccessful interventions, as well as the potential for artificial intelligence (AI) to assist in site evaluation and decision-making.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper