0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Plastic Waste Regime in Rwanda, Kenya and South Africa: A Comparative Case Study

American Journal of Law 2023 13 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Onyinyechi Lilian Uche

Summary

This comparative study examines plastic waste management policies in Rwanda, Kenya, and South Africa, highlighting how each country has taken different approaches. Rwanda emphasizes comprehensive recycling and community engagement, Kenya implemented a ban on plastic bags, and South Africa adopted extended producer responsibility. The study suggests that while these diverse strategies have had varying success, they offer valuable lessons for reducing plastic pollution in developing nations.

Purpose: Plastic waste has become a major environmental concern worldwide, posing significant challenges to ecosystems, human health, and sustainable development. This case study explores the plastic waste regimes in three African countries: Rwanda, Kenya and South Africa. By examining these countries' policies, strategies, and initiatives, the study aims to highlight their approaches to managing plastic waste and draw lessons for effective waste management practices. Methodology: The case study utilises a comparative analysis framework to identify similarities and differences in the plastic waste regimes of the three countries. It examines the regulatory frameworks, waste management infrastructure, public awareness campaigns, and recycling initiatives implemented in each country.Furthermore, the study delves into plastic waste's socio-economic and environmental impacts and evaluates the effectiveness of the measures taken to address the issue. Findings: Findings demonstrate that Kenya, Rwanda, and South Africa have adopted diverse strategies to tackle plastic waste. Rwanda has established a comprehensive waste management system emphasising recycling and community engagement, while Kenya has implemented a ban on plastic bags. South Africa, on the other hand, has embraced extended producer responsibility and developed a recycling infrastructure. These strategies have led to varying degrees of success in reducing plastic waste and promoting sustainable practices. An examination of the challenges faced by each country revealed factors such as inadequate waste infrastructure, limited resources, and the need for behavioural change among citizens. It also identified the role of stakeholders, including government agencies, non-governmental organizations, and the private sector, in driving plastic waste management initiatives. Recommendations: Finally, relying on the substantive legitimacy theory, the study provides recommendations based on the acceptability of the policies and best practices observed in the case countries. These include investment in waste management infrastructure, public education and awareness campaigns, and stakeholder collaboration. Countries can effectively address the plastic waste challenge by adopting an integrated approach that combines policy interventions, infrastructure development, and behavioural change. Overall, this case study contributes to the understanding of plastic waste management in Rwanda, Kenya and South Africa, shedding light on successful strategies and areas for improvement. It emphasises the importance of a holistic and collaborative approach to create sustainable plastic waste regimes that protect the environment, promote circular economy principles, and safeguard public health.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Break Free from Plastics: Environmental Perspectives and Evidence from Rwanda

This paper reviews plastic pollution challenges in Rwanda and sub-Saharan Africa, documenting evidence of microplastic contamination in inland and coastal waters and evaluating the effectiveness of plastic bans and extended producer responsibility policies in reducing plastic waste.

Article Tier 2

Plastic Waste Management in Rwanda

This study examines plastic waste management challenges in Rwanda, analyzing how rising living standards are increasing plastic consumption and waste generation, and evaluating the gap between current recycling capacity (only 10% of global plastic waste recycled) and the need for effective policies to prevent microplastic and chemical exposure harms to public health and ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

Impact of Policy Design on Plastic Waste Reduction in Africa

This paper is not about microplastics; it analyzes the design and effectiveness of single-use plastic bag policies across 39 African countries, identifying policy gaps that allow plastic waste to persist despite widespread bans.

Article Tier 2

Reducing plastic waste

This paper examined strategies and policy mechanisms for reducing plastic waste, reviewing effectiveness of bans, extended producer responsibility, and behavior change interventions in different national contexts.

Article Tier 2

Macro problems from microplastics: Toward a sustainable policy framework for managing microplastic waste in Africa

Researchers critically reviewed regulatory and policy approaches to managing microplastic pollution across African countries. They found that while environmental monitoring studies demonstrate an urgent need for action, the effectiveness of existing plastic waste policies in Africa remains poorly understood. The study proposes a sustainable policy framework tailored to the unique challenges African nations face in reducing microplastic waste generation and environmental contamination.

Share this paper