0
Article Tier 2 Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Plastic Waste Regime in Rwanda, Kenya and South Africa: A Comparative Case Study

American Journal of Law 2023 13 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This comparative study examines plastic waste management policies in Rwanda, Kenya, and South Africa, highlighting how each country has taken different approaches. Rwanda emphasizes comprehensive recycling and community engagement, Kenya implemented a ban on plastic bags, and South Africa adopted extended producer responsibility. The study suggests that while these diverse strategies have had varying success, they offer valuable lessons for reducing plastic pollution in developing nations.

Purpose: Plastic waste has become a major environmental concern worldwide, posing significant challenges to ecosystems, human health, and sustainable development. This case study explores the plastic waste regimes in three African countries: Rwanda, Kenya and South Africa. By examining these countries' policies, strategies, and initiatives, the study aims to highlight their approaches to managing plastic waste and draw lessons for effective waste management practices. Methodology: The case study utilises a comparative analysis framework to identify similarities and differences in the plastic waste regimes of the three countries. It examines the regulatory frameworks, waste management infrastructure, public awareness campaigns, and recycling initiatives implemented in each country.Furthermore, the study delves into plastic waste's socio-economic and environmental impacts and evaluates the effectiveness of the measures taken to address the issue. Findings: Findings demonstrate that Kenya, Rwanda, and South Africa have adopted diverse strategies to tackle plastic waste. Rwanda has established a comprehensive waste management system emphasising recycling and community engagement, while Kenya has implemented a ban on plastic bags. South Africa, on the other hand, has embraced extended producer responsibility and developed a recycling infrastructure. These strategies have led to varying degrees of success in reducing plastic waste and promoting sustainable practices. An examination of the challenges faced by each country revealed factors such as inadequate waste infrastructure, limited resources, and the need for behavioural change among citizens. It also identified the role of stakeholders, including government agencies, non-governmental organizations, and the private sector, in driving plastic waste management initiatives. Recommendations: Finally, relying on the substantive legitimacy theory, the study provides recommendations based on the acceptability of the policies and best practices observed in the case countries. These include investment in waste management infrastructure, public education and awareness campaigns, and stakeholder collaboration. Countries can effectively address the plastic waste challenge by adopting an integrated approach that combines policy interventions, infrastructure development, and behavioural change. Overall, this case study contributes to the understanding of plastic waste management in Rwanda, Kenya and South Africa, shedding light on successful strategies and areas for improvement. It emphasises the importance of a holistic and collaborative approach to create sustainable plastic waste regimes that protect the environment, promote circular economy principles, and safeguard public health.

More Papers Like This

Article

Global plastic governance approaches and policy pathways for strengthening South Africa’s circular plastics economy

AI summary Read the abstract

A comparative analysis of Rwanda and Germany's plastic governance models found that strict bans with civic enforcement and advanced EPR schemes with deposit-return systems both successfully reduce plastic pollution, offering transferable lessons for South Africa's underdeveloped microplastic regulation. This matters because effective national governance frameworks are essential to curbing the microplastic inputs that ultimately reach marine and human systems.

Article Tier 2

Break Free from Plastics: Environmental Perspectives and Evidence from Rwanda

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper reviews plastic pollution challenges in Rwanda and sub-Saharan Africa, documenting evidence of microplastic contamination in inland and coastal waters and evaluating the effectiveness of plastic bans and extended producer responsibility policies in reducing plastic waste.

Article Tier 2

Plastic Waste Management in Rwanda

AI summary Read the abstract

This study examines plastic waste management challenges in Rwanda, analyzing how rising living standards are increasing plastic consumption and waste generation, and evaluating the gap between current recycling capacity (only 10% of global plastic waste recycled) and the need for effective policies to prevent microplastic and chemical exposure harms to public health and ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

Investigation on Plastic Wastes in Nyamasheke District, Rwanda: Quantification, Characterization and Management Framework Design

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers studied plastic waste in rural Rwandan markets and found that even though almost everyone knew about the country's plastic bag ban, most plastic waste (mainly bottles and food wrappers) was still being burned or dumped in the open rather than properly disposed of. Burning plastic releases toxic chemicals into the air, and dumping it contaminates soil and water — both of which can expose nearby communities to harmful substances through breathing, drinking water, or food grown in polluted soil. The findings show that banning certain plastics isn't enough on its own — real change also requires better trash collection systems and disposal habits, a l

Article Tier 2

A Regional Response to the Global Challenge of Single-Use Plastic Pollution: Regulatory Frameworks in IGAD Countries

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers analyzed single-use plastic regulations across member states of the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) in East Africa, finding that while most countries have enacted some form of ban or waste legislation, extended producer responsibility schemes remain nascent and regional harmonization is the most pragmatic path toward effective enforcement.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper