We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
A bold new purpose for an old method: Using invertebrate kick‐netting to improve monitoring of microplastic pollution in running waters
AI summary Read the abstract
This study tested whether the kick-net sampling method already used routinely by ecologists to monitor stream invertebrates could also serve as an efficient tool for measuring microplastic pollution in freshwater streams. Testing across 28 streams, kick-netting captured microplastics at higher concentrations than standard drift or sediment sampling methods because it simultaneously collects particles suspended in the water column and those resting on the streambed. Adapting existing monitoring infrastructure to also track microplastics could dramatically reduce the cost and effort of long-term freshwater microplastic surveillance, supporting better-informed environmental regulation.
Abstract Freshwaters are impacted by many pollutants. Scientists and resource managers need to reliably detect and monitor these pollutants by employing appropriate sampling techniques to quantify and mitigate their impacts. Emerging freshwater contaminants such as microplastics are difficult to monitor as effective sampling techniques have not been fully developed and lack standardization. Here, we propose a novel method, adapted from stream invertebrate kick‐net sampling, which can be employed for long‐term, standardized microplastic monitoring. We hypothesized that invertebrate kick‐net sampling would be effective at collecting microplastics, capturing higher microplastic concentrations than standard microplastic sampling, due to collecting suspended and benthic microplastics simultaneously. We sampled 28 streams for microplastics using standard drift and sediment microplastic collection methods and invertebrate kick‐netting. As predicted, kick‐netting captured microplastics at higher concentrations than conventional sampling, regardless of whether values were expressed per volume of water (as in drift samples), per kg of sediment or per area sampled (as in benthic samples). Consequently, kick‐net sampling has the potential to be a time‐ and cost‐efficient tool for monitoring microplastic pollution. We recommend the employment of invertebrate kick‐netting as a new, standardized means to investigate and routinely monitor microplastic concentrations worldwide. This would generate a more robust dataset of global freshwater microplastic pollution, making it possible to answer unresolved questions pertaining to changes in microplastic pollution profiles. Standardized, long‐term records of microplastic concentrations in freshwaters would also allow a more accurate assessment of the ecological risks of microplastic pollution. Finally, long‐term microplastic data could be used to inform much‐needed regulatory decisions pertaining to microplastic pollution.
More Papers Like This
Screening for microplastic particles in plankton samples: How to integrate marine litter assessment into existing monitoring programs?
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers monitored microplastic abundance in zooplankton net samples, finding 100–10,000 particles per cubic meter with no consistent seasonal or depth pattern. The study proposes that existing zooplankton monitoring programs could be adapted to simultaneously track microplastic pollution at relatively low additional cost.
Identification and quantification of microplastic particles in drinking water treatment sludge as an integrative approach to determine microplastic abundance in a freshwater river
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used drinking water treatment plant sludge as an integrative sampler to estimate microplastic abundance in a freshwater river over extended periods, capturing larger water volumes than conventional net or filtration methods. The approach improves representativeness of microplastic occurrence data in flowing water bodies.
Does what we find depend on how we sample? Measured streambed microplastic concentrations can be affected by the choice of sampling method
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared how different microplastic sampling methods — including nets, pumps, and bulk water collection — affect measured concentrations in streambed sediments, finding large methodological differences in results. The study underscores that sampling protocol choice strongly influences what researchers find.
Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris
AI summary Read the abstract
New sampling and sorting methods were developed for collecting microplastics from turbid rivers and streams with high suspended sediment loads and floating debris, environments where standard drift net methods fail. The approach enables microplastic monitoring in challenging freshwater settings such as large rivers in urbanized watersheds.
Isokinectic pump sampling – a methodoligy addressing the small size ranges of microplastic in rivers
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed an isokinetic pump sampling methodology for accurately capturing microplastic transport in rivers across the small size fractions typically missed by net-based sampling, demonstrating improved representativeness and comparability of MP monitoring data as part of the Austrian 'Alplast' project.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.