0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Food & Water Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Advancing food safety risk assessment in China: development of new approach methodologies (NAMs)

Frontiers in Toxicology 2023 7 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Yongning Wu, Daoyuan Yang, Yongning Wu, Hui Yang, Miaoying Shi, Daoyuan Yang, Daoyuan Yang, Haixia Sui, Xudong Jia, Haixia Sui Daoyuan Yang, Haixia Sui Haixia Sui, Haixia Sui, Yongning Wu, Yongning Wu, Haixia Sui Haixia Sui, Haixia Sui Zhaoping Liu, Yongning Wu, Haixia Sui Haixia Sui Yongning Wu, Yongning Wu, Yongning Wu, Yongning Wu, Haixia Sui, Haixia Sui, Yongning Wu, Yongning Wu, Yongning Wu, Yongning Wu, Haixia Sui, Yongning Wu, Yongning Wu, Yongning Wu, Haixia Sui Yongning Wu, Yongning Wu, Haixia Sui Haixia Sui, Haixia Sui Haixia Sui, Haixia Sui, Haixia Sui

Summary

This paper is not about microplastics — it reviews the development and application of new approach methodologies (NAMs) — including in vitro and computational methods — for food safety risk assessment in China, focusing on reducing reliance on animal testing.

Study Type In vitro

Novel techniques and methodologies are being developed to advance food safety risk assessment into the next-generation. Considering the shortcomings of traditional animal testing, new approach methodologies (NAMs) will be the main tools for the next-generation risk assessment (NGRA), using non-animal methodologies such as <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in silico</i> approaches. The United States Environmental Protection Agency and the European Food Safety Authority have established work plans to encourage the development and application of NAMs in NGRA. Currently, NAMs are more commonly used in research than in regulatory risk assessment. China is also developing NAMs for NGRA but without a comprehensive review of the current work. This review summarizes major NAM-related research articles from China and highlights the China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment (CFSA) as the primary institution leading the implementation of NAMs in NGRA in China. The projects of CFSA on NAMs such as the Food Toxicology Program and the strategies for implementing NAMs in NGRA are outlined. Key issues and recommendations, such as discipline development and team building, are also presented to promote NAMs development in China and worldwide.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper