0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Experimental Study of Particle Transport and Deposition Distribution over Complex Terrains Based on Spherical Alumina

Atmosphere 2023 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Yusheng Liu, Jie Zhang, Hongchao Dun, Kang Gong, Li Shi, Ning Huang

Summary

This experimental study examined how particle size distribution and surface conditions affect the transport and deposition of atmospheric particulate matter, with implications for understanding airborne microplastic dispersal. Airborne particles including microplastics can travel long distances and deposit in remote environments far from their source.

The transport and deposition of atmospheric particulate matter have attracted significant attention recently due to the increasing frequency of extreme disaster events, such as dust storms, volcanic eruptions, and extensive forest fires. The size distribution of the transported material and the conditions of the land–air interface are dominant factors in comprehending the detrimental potential of atmospheric particulate matter. However, it is still a challenge to understand the mechanism of dust deposition, especially over complex terrain. In an effort to investigate the deposition characteristics of particles over complex terrain, a series of experiments were conducted in a multifunctional environmental wind tunnel. The results show that the wind speed directly above the top of the mild slope model is significantly greater than that in the steep slope model, which indicates that a steep slope has a greater blocking effect on wind fields. At low wind speeds, the average wind speed at the top of the mild slope model is 17.8% higher than that at the top of the steep slope model, and at high wind speeds the average wind speed at the top of the mild slope model is 8.6% higher than that at the top of the steep slope model. The influence trend of the steep slope model and the combination model is basically the same, with both decreasing first and then increasing with the direction of wind velocity. The amount of surface deposition is greatly affected by the location of the feeding point and the microscale characteristics of the surface. In the steep slope model, the deposition is mainly distributed on the windward side, while the leeward side has a small amount of deposition. In the mild slope model, particles are deposited not only on the windward side, but also on the leeward side. The average rate of decline in deposition flux in the steep slope model is 88.4% and 75.1% in the mild slope model. The use of the combination model reduces the particle concentration at the back end compared with the single model. In three different models, the deposition on the windward side was shown to be significantly greater than that on the leeward side of the model. Our work increases understanding of the deposition of coarse dust particles over complex terrain and provides basic data for improving the accuracy of large-region particle transport and deposition simulations.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Effects of Shape and Size on Microplastic Atmospheric Settling Velocity

Researchers measured atmospheric settling and horizontal drift velocities of various microplastic shapes and sizes in controlled settling chambers, providing empirical data needed to improve atmospheric transport models that explain how microplastics reach remote environments.

Article Tier 2

A mechanistic approach to evaluating atmospheric deposition of micro- and nanoplastic particles

This study developed a theoretical framework to better understand how microplastic and nanoplastic particles move through the atmosphere and deposit onto land and water surfaces via wet and dry deposition. By drawing on knowledge from how other aerosols like mineral dust behave, the researchers identified key physical processes — including particle size, shape, and density — that govern how far microplastics travel and where they land. The work is important for modeling the global spread of microplastic pollution, including to remote regions far from pollution sources.

Review Tier 2

Distribution and transport of atmospheric microplastics and the environmental impacts: A review

This review examines the distribution, transport, and environmental impacts of atmospheric microplastics, synthesizing evidence that airborne plastics are found globally from urban centers to remote polar regions. The authors identify deposition via precipitation as a major pathway by which atmospheric microplastics contaminate soil and water surfaces.

Article Tier 2

Is transport of microplastics different from mineral particles? Idealized wind tunnel studies on polyethylene microspheres

Wind tunnel experiments revealed that plastic (polyethylene) microspheres behave differently from mineral dust particles when transported by wind, particularly on hydrophobic surfaces, where plastic particles detach and become airborne more readily. Particle-to-particle collisions were found to both assist and impede detachment. These findings help explain why microplastics are found in remote atmospheric environments and improve models for predicting how far plastic particles can travel through the air from pollution sources.

Article Tier 2

Twist, turn and encounter: the trajectories of small atmospheric particles unravelled

Experiments and simulations studied how non-spherical solid particles (including microplastics) settle through air, finding unexpectedly complex tumbling and spiraling trajectories even at low speeds. These insights improve predictions of how airborne microplastic particles travel and deposit across landscapes.

Share this paper