0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Fatigue Assessment Comparison between a Ship Motion-Based Data-Driven Model and a Direct Fatigue Calculation Method

Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 2023 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Xiao Lang, Da Wu, Wuliu Tian, Chi Zhang, Jonas W. Ringsberg, Wengang Mao

Summary

Researchers compared a ship motion-based data-driven model against a direct fatigue calculation method for assessing structural fatigue in ocean-crossing vessels subjected to wave-induced loads. The study evaluated how well motion sensor data can predict stress variations in ship structures, offering a practical alternative to computationally intensive direct methods.

Study Type Environmental

Ocean-crossing ship structures continuously suffer from wave-induced loads when sailing at sea. The encountered wave loads cause significant variations in ship structural stresses, leading to accumulated fatigue damage. Where large inherent uncertainties still exist, it is now common to use spectral methods for direct fatigue calculation when evaluating ship fatigue. This paper investigates the use of a machine learning technique to establish a model for 2800TEU container vessel fatigue assessment. Measurement data from 3 years of cross-Atlantic sailing demonstrated and validated the machine learning model. In this investigation, the ship’s motions were used as inputs to build a machine learning model. The fatigue damage amounts predicted using a machine learning model were compared with those obtained from full-scale measurements and direct fatigue calculation. The pros and cons of the methods are compared in terms of their capability, robustness, and prediction accuracy.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper