We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
China's marine environmental public interest litigation: current situation, challenges, and improvement approach –analysis based on 339 cases
Summary
This study analyzed 339 marine environmental public interest litigation cases in China, examining current challenges and potential improvements in how the legal system addresses marine pollution and ecological damage. Researchers found that while the legal framework is developing, inconsistencies in case handling and enforcement remain significant barriers to effective ocean environmental protection.
Marine pollution and ecological damage seriously undermine economic and social development and human life and health and threaten the sustainable development of human society. With the rapid development of industrialization and urbanization and the intense exploitation of marine space and marine natural resources, China’s marine ecology is facing serious problems such as pollution of marine waters, the decline of marine plant and animal resources, and the impairment of the ecological function of coastal zones. China’s marine environmental public interest litigation (MEPIL) has achieved remarkable results in protecting marine natural resources, safeguarding the marine ecosystem, and preventing marine pollution and ecological damage. The paper closely combines the judicial practice of Chinese MEPIL, exploring 339 legal cases brought by administrative organs, public prosecutors, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) presented on the China Judgment Online from 2018 to 2023. It can be concluded that three modes of MEPIL, namely civil, administrative, and civil public interest litigation incidental to criminal proceedings, have been constructed. Attempts have been made to confirm the standing of the litigation, improve the pre-litigation procedure, and clarify the types of compensation. However, significant obstacles exist in China’s MEPIL. Theoretical clarifications and practical distinctions with other types of proceedings should be made. The current standing should be improved regarding procuratorial organs, administrative authorities, and social organizations. Court jurisdiction systems need to be enhanced. Inconsistencies in the legal provisions on whether MEPIL cases must be under the exclusive jurisdiction of the maritime courts have impeded the efficiency of the handling of cases. The corresponding solutions to the aforementioned obstacles are also analyzed. Clarifying the MEPIL’s nature and improving the relevant laws, and regulations, are essential measures. In addition, providing the explicit interpretation of the legal provisions, expanding the standing, and improving the jurisdictional and other legal system should be explored.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
The rule of law for marine environmental governance in maritime transport: China’s experience
This review examines China's 40-year development of marine environmental governance law for maritime transport, analyzing legislation, enforcement, and judiciary practices to explain how China has navigated the tension between domestic and international law and the competing interests of flag states and coastal states.
The difficulties and path of China’s NGOs participating in marine plastic waste governance
Researchers examined the challenges and pathways for Chinese non-governmental organizations to participate effectively in marine plastic waste governance, analyzing organizational capacity, regulatory frameworks, and stakeholder relationships. The study found that NGOs face significant institutional barriers and recommends policy reforms that provide clearer roles and stable funding for civil society engagement in ocean plastic management.
Looking for a Chinese solution to global problems: The situation and countermeasures of marine plastic waste and microplastics pollution governance system in China
This study analyzed China's marine plastic waste and microplastic pollution governance system, examining policy frameworks across blue economy development, plastics industry reform, and public health awareness, while proposing countermeasures to curb marine pollution intensification.
The Legal dilemmas and pathways for managing plastic waste pollution in China: An assessment of current regulations and a vision for future governance frameworks
This paper systematically analyses the current state of plastic waste legal regulation in China and proposes a framework for future governance, examining how the rapid growth of the e-commerce, express delivery, and food delivery industries has sharply increased plastic product consumption. The authors assess existing regulatory gaps and outline pathways toward more effective and comprehensive plastic waste management law.
China’s Marine Environmental Protection Strategy in the Background of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Progress, Challenges, and Outlook
This review examines China's marine environmental protection strategy, tracing its development and analyzing how the COVID-19 pandemic affected marine pollution management. The pandemic both increased plastic waste (from masks and PPE) and disrupted environmental enforcement, creating new challenges for China's marine conservation efforts.