0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Food & Water Human Health Effects Reproductive & Development Sign in to save

Endocrine‐disrupting chemicals: Mainstream recognition of health effects and implications for the practicing internist

Journal of Internal Medicine 2023 18 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Leonardo Trasande, Robert M. Sargis

Summary

This review summarizes the growing medical evidence that endocrine-disrupting chemicals found widely in the environment contribute to chronic diseases in adults, including metabolic, cardiovascular, and reproductive conditions. Researchers estimate these chemicals are linked to over 90,000 deaths annually in the United States and tens of billions of dollars in lost economic productivity. The study calls on practicing physicians to become better informed about these environmental exposures and to incorporate them into patient care.

Rapidly advancing evidence documents that a broad array of synthetic chemicals found ubiquitously in the environment contribute to disease and disability across the lifespan. Although the early literature focused on early life exposures, endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are now understood to contribute substantially to chronic disease in adulthood, especially metabolic, cardiovascular, and reproductive consequences as well as endocrine cancers. The contribution to mortality is substantial, with over 90,000 deaths annually and at least $39 billion/year in lost economic productivity in the United States (US) due to exposure to certain phthalates that are used as plasticizers in food packaging. Importantly, exposures are disproportionately high in low-income and minoritized populations, driving disparities in these conditions. Though non-Hispanic Blacks and Mexican Americans comprise 12.6% and 13.5% of the US population, they bear 16.5% and 14.6% of the disease burden due to EDCs, respectively. Many of these exposures can be modified through safe and simple behavioral changes supported by proactive government action to both limit known hazardous exposures and to proactively screen new industrial chemicals prior to their use. Routine healthcare maintenance should include guidance to reduce EDC exposures, and a recent report by the Institute of Medicine suggests that testing be conducted, particularly in populations heavily exposed to perfluoroalkyl substances-chemicals used in nonstick coatings as well as oil- and water-resistant clothing.

Share this paper