0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Quantitative photography for rapid, reliable measurement of marine macro‐plastic pollution

Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2023 7 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jennifer L. Lavers, Jennifer L. Lavers, Jennifer L. Lavers, Jennifer L. Lavers, Joseph Razzell Hollis Alexander L. Bond, Alexander L. Bond, Jennifer L. Lavers, Alexander L. Bond, Alexander L. Bond, Gabrielle Henderson, Gabrielle Henderson, Alexander L. Bond, Alexander L. Bond, Jennifer L. Lavers, Jennifer L. Lavers, Valeriya Komyakova, Jennifer L. Lavers, Jennifer L. Lavers, Valeriya Komyakova, Jennifer L. Lavers, Jennifer L. Lavers, Alexander L. Bond, Jennifer L. Lavers, Alexander L. Bond, Jennifer L. Lavers, Jennifer L. Lavers, Jennifer L. Lavers, Alexander L. Bond, Edward Rea, Jennifer L. Lavers, Valeriya Komyakova, Jennifer L. Lavers, Alexander L. Bond, Alexander L. Bond, Valeriya Komyakova, Jennifer L. Lavers, Jennifer L. Lavers, Jennifer L. Lavers, Jennifer L. Lavers, Jennifer L. Lavers, Jennifer L. Lavers, Jennifer L. Lavers, Valeriya Komyakova, Joseph Razzell Hollis

Summary

A new standardised photography and automated image-analysis pipeline can measure the size, shape, and colour of up to 250 plastic fragments at once with 98% detection accuracy, dramatically reducing the labour and observer bias of manual methods. Applied to nearly 4,000 plastic fragments from seabirds on Lord Howe Island, the approach produced highly comparable data across different cameras and locations, offering a practical standard method for large-scale marine plastic pollution monitoring.

Body Systems

Abstract Plastics are now ubiquitous in the environment and have been studied in wildlife and in ecosystems for more than 50 years. Measurement of size, shape and colour data for individual fragments of plastic is labour‐intensive, unreliable and prone to observer bias, particularly when it comes to assessment of colour, which relies on arbitrary and inconsistently defined colour categorisations. There is a clear need for a standard method for data collection on plastic pollution, particularly one that can be readily automated given the number of samples involved. This study describes a new method for standardised photography of marine plastics in the 1–100 mm size range (meso‐ and macro‐plastics), including colour correction to account for any image‐to‐image variation in lighting that may impact colour reproduction or apparent brightness. Automated image analysis is then applied to detect individual fragments of plastic for quantitative measurement of size, shape, and colour. The method was tested on 3793 fragments of debris ingested by Flesh‐footed Shearwaters ( Ardenna carneipes ) on Lord Howe Island, Australia, and compare results from photos taken in two separate locations using different equipment. Photos were acquired of up to 250 fragments at a time with a spatial resolution of 70 μm/pixel and were colour‐corrected using a reference chart to ensure accurate reproduction of colour. The automated image analysis pipeline was found to have a 98% success rate at detecting fragments, and the different size and shape parameters that can be outputted by the pipeline were compared in terms of usefulness. The evidence shown in this study should strongly encourage the uptake of this method for cataloguing macro‐scale plastic pollution, as it provides substantially higher quality data with accurate, reliable measurements of size, shape and colour for individual plastics that can be readily compared between disparate datasets.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper