0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Unveiling the Microfiber Release Footprint: Guiding Control Strategies in the Textile Production Industry

Environmental Science & Technology 2023 21 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Siwen Zheng, Siwen Zheng, Xunchang Fei, Mengjing Wang, Mengjing Wang, Mengjing Wang, Mengjing Wang, Mengjing Wang, Mengjing Wang, Mengjing Wang, Xunchang Fei, Siwen Zheng, Mingliang Fang, Hong Heng See, Junjie Yang, Xunchang Fei, Mengjing Wang, Hong Heng See, Xunchang Fei, Siwen Zheng, Linran Jia, Mingliang Fang, Mingliang Fang, Jiuwei Li, Zhi Yuan Yong, Mingliang Fang, Xunchang Fei, Xunchang Fei, Xunchang Fei, Zhi Yuan Yong, Linran Jia, Mingliang Fang, Ee Ling Yong Hong Heng See, Mingliang Fang, Mengjing Wang, Linran Jia, Jiuwei Li, Mingliang Fang, Mingliang Fang, Mingliang Fang, Yunbo Lv, Xunchang Fei, Yunbo Lv, Xunchang Fei, Xunchang Fei, Mengjing Wang, Mengjing Wang, Xunchang Fei, Mingliang Fang, Mingliang Fang, Mingliang Fang, Mingliang Fang, Mingliang Fang, Mingliang Fang, Mingliang Fang, Xunchang Fei, Mingliang Fang, Ee Ling Yong

Summary

This study quantified microfiber emissions from a large textile production facility across multiple stages of manufacturing and finishing, providing the first comprehensive map of microfiber release during textile production. The results identified specific processes contributing most to microfiber pollution and informed potential control strategies.

Microplastic fibers from textiles have been known to significantly contribute to marine microplastic pollution. However, little is known about the microfiber formation and discharge during textile production. In this study, we have quantified microfiber emissions from one large and representative textile factory during different stages, spanning seven different materials, including cotton, polyester, and blended fabrics, to further guide control strategies. Wet-processing steps released up to 25 times more microfibers than home laundering, with dyeing contributing to 95.0% of the total emissions. Microfiber release could be reduced by using white coloring, a lower dyeing temperature, and a shorter dyeing duration. Thinner, denser yarns increased microfiber pollution, whereas using tightly twisted fibers mitigated release. Globally, wet textile processing potentially produced 6.4 kt of microfibers in 2020, with China, India, and the US as significant contributors. The study underlined the environmental impact of textile production and the need for mitigation strategies, particularly in dyeing processes and fiber choice. In addition, no significant difference was observed between the virgin polyesters and the used ones. Replacing virgin fibers with recycled fibers in polyester fabrics, due to their increasing consumption, might offer another potential solution. The findings highlighted the substantial impact of textile production on microfiber released into the environment, and optimization of material selection, knitting technologies, production processing, and recycled materials could be effective mitigation strategies.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper