0
Article Tier 2 Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Comparing Ocular Toxicity of Legacy and Alternative Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Zebrafish Larvae

Toxics 2023 10 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the eye toxicity of legacy PFAS chemicals (PFOS and PFOA) with their newer alternatives (PFBS and PFBA) using zebrafish larvae. They found that PFOS caused the most significant visual impairment, reducing both phototactic and optomotor responses in a concentration-dependent manner, while the alternative chemicals showed no detectable visual toxicity. The study suggests that while replacement PFAS compounds appear safer for visual development, the legacy chemical PFOS poses notable risks to eye function.

Studies comparing the ocular toxicity potential between legacy and alternative PFAS are lacking. To address this research gap, zebrafish larvae were exposed to both legacy PFAS (i.e., perfluorooctanesulfonic acid [PFOS] and perfluorooctanoic acid [PFOA]) and their corresponding alternatives (i.e., perfluorobutanesulfonic acid [PFBS] and perfluorobutanoic acid [PFBA]). Alterations in their visual behaviors, such as phototactic and optomotor responses (OMR), were assessed at sublethal concentrations. Gene expression variations in visual function-associated pathways were also measured. Visual behavioral assessment revealed that PFOS exposure resulted in concentration-dependent reductions in phototactic responses at 10-1000 μg/L, with PFOA exerting reduction effects only at 100 mg/L. However, their two alternatives had no effect at all tested concentrations. Following an improved contrast-OMR (C-OMR) assessment, PFOS decreased the OMR to a water flow stimulus at 10, 100, and 1000 μg/L. The gene expression analysis revealed that PFOS exposure markedly downregulated most genes involved in the opsins in the photoreceptor and phototransduction cascade, which explains the observed visual behavior changes well. Our findings indicate that PFOS is the most likely PFAS to cause visual toxicity, with PFOA present but less likely, and their substitutes, PFBS and PFBA, cannot be classified as visually toxic to zebrafish.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Sodium p-Perfluorous Nonenoxybenzene Sulfonate (OBS) Induces Developmental Toxicity Through Apoptosis in Developing Zebrafish Embryos: A Comparison with Perfluorooctane Sulfonate

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that OBS, an alternative to the banned PFAS compound PFOS, induces developmental toxicity in aquatic organisms despite being marketed as safer, raising concerns that PFOS substitutes may carry similar risks and warrant more rigorous environmental safety assessment.

Article Tier 2

Fish to learn: insights into the effects of environmental chemicals on eye development and visual function in zebrafish

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines how zebrafish are being used to study the effects of environmental chemicals on eye development and vision, offering insights relevant to understanding human visual impairments. Researchers highlight that zebrafish share key features of human color vision and retinal structure, making them a valuable model for studying how pollutants affect the visual system during early development. The study summarizes findings on chemicals ranging from heavy metals to pesticides and their impacts on eye formation and visual function.

Article Tier 2

An Integrated Metabolomics-Based Model, and Identification of Potential Biomarkers, of Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid Toxicity in Zebrafish Embryos

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers used advanced metabolomics techniques to study how the industrial chemical PFOS affects zebrafish embryo development at the molecular level. They identified specific metabolic disruptions and potential biomarkers that could indicate early PFOS exposure. The study provides new insights into how persistent environmental pollutants like PFAS interfere with biological processes during critical developmental stages.

Article Tier 2

Developmental Toxicity of Chlorinated Polyfluorinated Ether Sulfonate (F-53B), a Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) Alternative, in Embryos and Larvae of Blotched Snakehead (Channa maculata)

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists tested F-53B, a chemical used to replace banned toxic substances in products like non-stick cookware, and found it severely harms developing fish by causing birth defects and damaging their organs. This matters because F-53B builds up in the environment just like the toxic chemicals it replaced, suggesting it could pose similar health risks to humans through contaminated water and food. The study shows that "safer" chemical alternatives aren't always actually safer and need thorough testing before widespread use.

Article Tier 2

Combined exposure with microplastics increases the toxic effects of PFOS and its alternative F-53B in adult zebrafish

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that when zebrafish were exposed to microplastics along with PFOS or its replacement chemical F-53B (both are "forever chemicals"), the combined toxic effects were worse than either pollutant alone. The microplastics worsened liver inflammation, disrupted energy metabolism, and altered gut bacteria. This is relevant to human health because people are simultaneously exposed to both microplastics and PFAS chemicals through food and water.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper