We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Substances of Concern in Ecodesign and Other EU Law
Summary
This review examines the concept of 'substances of concern' as introduced by the EU's Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), which came into force in July 2024, explaining how this dynamic definition based on the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability creates a new layer of chemical management requirements for product designers. The authors analyze how this framework interacts with other EU chemical regulations to advance environmental sustainability goals.
Substances of Concern in Ecodesign and Other EU Law A New Layer of Chemicals Management for Environmental SustainabilityThe notion of "substances of concern" is not new in EU chemicals policy, although it has been used in some different contexts (e.g. regulatory risk management, biocides).With the landmark new Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) in force since 18.7.2024a wide multi-reference and dynamic definition of "substance of concern" has been introduced, based on the European Commission's Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability.The ESPR definition is accompanied by various provisions allowing to foresee performance and information requirements in future ecodesign measures.The same term has also appeared in other existing and emerging EU laws and policy initiatives, namely those under the European Green Deal, where it already triggers reporting actions for certain large companies (corporate sustainability reporting) and the European Commission (for batteries), while other regulations still to be adopted (packaging and packaging waste, vehicles) also make use of it.The aim of this article is to provide a review, compare and assess the main EU legal provisions in force and forthcoming -as far as they govern "substances of concern" -taking the new ESPR provisions as a benchmark.In addition, related EU laws, proposals and other initiatives which do not or only marginally use this terminology as of today, or that can be considered as "false friends" (e.g."Substances of Very High Concern -SVHC"; "Substances of Concern in Products -SCIP"; "most harmful substances"; REACH restrictions, e.g."universal" PFAS proposal; "substances of emerging concern"), shall be addressed.Some notable industry approaches to tackle chemicals management including "substances of concern" will also be discussed.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Strategies for Dealing with Substances of Concern in Product Design – a Review of Five Cases
This review examined design strategies for dealing with substances of concern in products, covering approaches to substitute, minimize, or eliminate hazardous chemicals throughout the product lifecycle. The authors identified regulatory frameworks and practical design tools to guide manufacturers toward safer material choices.
Data Requirements for Implementing the “Essential-Use” Concept in Chemical Legislation
Researchers analyzed how the essential-use concept could be implemented in chemical legislation by examining existing cases under the Stockholm Convention and the EU REACH Regulation, including the restriction on intentionally added microplastics. The study suggests that current regulatory frameworks already consider elements of essential-use decision-making and that no drastic changes to data requirements would be necessary to apply this concept.
DataRequirements for Implementing the “Essential-Use”Concept in Chemical Legislation
Researchers examined the data requirements needed to implement the 'essential-use' concept within the Stockholm Convention and EU REACH Regulation chemical legislation frameworks. The study analyzed what types of substance-specific data would be necessary to determine whether a chemical's uses qualify as essential, informing proposed revisions to global and European chemical governance.
DataRequirements for Implementing the “Essential-Use”Concept in Chemical Legislation
Researchers examined the data requirements needed to implement the 'essential-use' concept within the Stockholm Convention and EU REACH Regulation chemical legislation frameworks. The study analyzed what types of substance-specific data would be necessary to determine whether a chemical's uses qualify as essential, informing proposed revisions to global and European chemical governance.
The upcoming European Soil Monitoring Law: An effective instrument for the protection of terrestrial ecosystems?
This analysis examines whether the upcoming European Soil Monitoring Law will effectively protect terrestrial ecosystems. The study suggests that while the regulation represents important progress, it needs to close gaps between existing chemical regulations and fully align with current European strategies for environmental protection and sustainability.