0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Bioplastics: An examination of variety, degradation, and environmental effects

Environmental Research Communications 2026
Judith S. Weis, Beth Ravit, Peter F. Strom, Richard Vaccaro

Summary

This review of existing research found that "bioplastics" (plastics made from plant materials instead of oil) are not automatically safer or better for the environment than regular plastics. Many bioplastics were actually more toxic than the conventional plastics they were compared to, and they can still break down into harmful microplastics. The bottom line: don't assume something is healthier just because it's labeled as a "bioplastic" — these products vary widely in how safe they actually are.

Study Type Environmental

Abstract There is considerable confusion about “bioplastics.” They are often touted as “greener” than conventional plastics and may be claimed to be biodegradable and compostable. However, there are a large number of different products claimed to be bioplastics, and they differ greatly in many characteristics. In this review, we discuss the great variety of bioplastic products derived from biological materials and compare their various chemical characteristics with conventional (petroleum-derived) plastics. We define a number of terms that are often confused or ambiguous. We examine the biodegradability of different bioplastics in various environments (e.g. higher or lower temperatures, composting, soil, freshwater, seawater) and the byproducts (e.g. chemicals, microplastics) that they may release during this process. In addition, we review studies that evaluated the toxicity of the products released, including toxicity to cell lines and bacteria, to plants and to terrestrial and aquatic animals. Many studies compare bioplastics with conventional plastics. The diverse bioplastics differ greatly in toxicity. Furthermore, toxicity test methods employed have been very different from one another – some have used solid pieces of plastic, some have used microplastics generated from the bioplastic, and some have used plastic product leachates. Different studies compare them with different conventional plastics. Many bioplastics are more toxic than the conventional plastics they were compared with. Therefore, it is impossible draw any overall conclusions that “bioplastics” as a group are more or less toxic than conventional plastics, but it would be an error to conclude that they are more “environmentally friendly.” Evaluation of bioplastics is much more complex than many assume.

Share this paper