We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Environmental and economic impact of sustainable anaesthesia interventions: a single-centre retrospective observational study
Summary
Researchers at a Swiss hospital found that implementing sustainable anesthesia practices — including eliminating the high-carbon anesthetic desflurane and reducing sevoflurane use — cut the environmental impact of anesthesia by 81% per procedure while simultaneously lowering costs by 11%, demonstrating that green healthcare practices can align with financial savings.
BACKGROUND: Anaesthesia contributes substantially to the environmental impact of healthcare. To reduce the ecological footprint of anaesthesia, a set of sustainability interventions was implemented in the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland. This study evaluates the environmental and economic implications of these interventions. METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective observational study. We analysed the environmental impact and financial implications of changes in sevoflurane, desflurane, propofol, and plastic consumption over 2 yr (April 2021 to March 2023). The study included pre-implementation, implementation, and post-implementation phases. RESULTS: After implementation of sustainability measures, desflurane use was eliminated, there was a decrease in the consumption of sevoflurane from a median (inter-quartile range) of 25 (14-39) ml per case to 11 (6-22) ml per case (P<0.0001). Propofol consumption increased from 250 (150-721) mg per case to 743 (370-1284) mg per case (P<0.0001). Use of plastics changed: in the first quarter analysed, two or more infusion syringes were used in 62% of cases, compared with 74% of cases in the last quarter (P<0.0001). Two or more infusion lines were used in 58% of cases in the first quarter analysed, compared with 68% of cases in the last quarter (P<0.0001). This resulted in an 81% reduction in overall environmental impact from 3 (0-7) to 1 (0-3) CO equivalents in kg per case (P<0.0001). The costs during the final study phase were 11% lower compared with those in the initial phase: from 25 (13-41) to 21 (14-31) CHF (Swiss francs) per case (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing sustainable anaesthesia interventions can significantly reduce the environmental impact and cost of anaesthesia.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Sustainability in the Operating Room
Researchers review the outsized environmental footprint of surgical operating rooms — particularly from volatile anesthetic agents, medications, and single-use equipment — and argue that anesthesiology has exceptional leverage to reduce healthcare's greenhouse gas emissions and waste burden as part of a broader sustainability transformation in medicine.
Misconceptions about sustainable anaesthesia
This article addresses common misconceptions about environmentally sustainable practices in anesthesia, covering topics like anesthetic gas choices, single-use versus reusable equipment, and recycling in operating rooms. The authors emphasize that sustainability in healthcare goes beyond carbon footprint and includes broader environmental and social considerations.
Sustainability in anaesthesia and critical care: beyond carbon
Researchers reviewed the full environmental footprint of healthcare — going beyond greenhouse gas emissions to include water pollution, toxic chemicals, and microplastics — and found that drugs like propofol and antibiotics discharged into waterways, along with massive quantities of disposable plastic equipment, pose serious ecological risks. The article calls on clinicians and policymakers to adopt holistic strategies that reduce waste, limit single-use plastics, and account for the full spectrum of environmental harm.
Carbon Footprint of Anesthesia: Comment
This commentary on a study about the carbon footprint of anesthesia discusses methodological considerations for accurately accounting for greenhouse gas emissions from healthcare, including factors like electricity source variability. The authors commend the original study's detailed approach and encourage similar analyses across other surgical procedures. Reducing anesthesia-related carbon emissions is one component of healthcare's broader sustainability goals.
Green surgery: to reduce carbon footprint
This paper examines the environmental footprint of surgical procedures and proposes strategies for green surgery, including reduction of single-use plastic instruments and packaging that contribute to operating theater waste streams. The authors call for systemic changes in hospital procurement to reduce carbon emissions from healthcare.