0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Implications of exposure route for the bioaccumulation potential of nanopolystyrene particles

Chemosphere 2024 5 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Jordan A. Pitt, Mark E. Hahn, Neelakanteswar Aluru

Summary

Researchers compared how nanoplastics accumulate in zebrafish larvae depending on whether particles enter through the gut or through waterborne exposure via skin and gills. The study found that waterborne exposure led to broader distribution of nanoplastics throughout the body and longer retention, while orally ingested particles were largely eliminated within 48 hours.

Microplastics and nanoplastics are found in marine biota across a wide range of trophic levels and environments. While a large portion of the information about plastic exposure comes from gastrointestinal (GI) data, the relevance of particle accumulation from an oral exposure compared with other types of exposure (e.g. dermal, respiratory) is unknown. To address this gap in knowledge, larval zebrafish (7 days post fertilization) were exposed to two different sizes of nanoplastics through either oral gavage or a waterborne exposure. Larvae were tracked for 48 h post exposure (hpe) to assess the migration and elimination of plastics. Larvae eliminated orally gavaged nanoplastics within 48 hpe. Oral gavage showed limited particle movement from the GI tract into other tissues. In contrast, waterborne nanoplastic-exposed larvae displayed notable fluorescence in tissues outside of the GI tract. The 50 nm waterborne-exposed larvae retained the particles past 48 hpe, and showed accumulation with neuromasts. For both sizes of plastic particles, the nanoplastics were eliminated from non-GI tract tissues by 24 hpe. Our results suggest that waterborne exposure leads to greater accumulation of plastic in comparison to oral exposure, suggesting that plastic accumulation in certain tissues is greater via routes of exposure other than oral consumption.

Share this paper