We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Are the BPA analogues an alternative to classical BPA? Comparison between 2D and alternative 3D in vitro neuron model to assess cytotoxic and genotoxic effects
Summary
Researchers compared the toxicity of BPA and five substitute chemicals (BPA analogues) that industry has been using as replacements, testing their effects on human nerve cells. Several BPA alternatives proved to be just as toxic or even more toxic than BPA itself, causing cell damage and genetic changes. This is concerning because these substitutes are found in plastics people use daily, and the findings suggest that replacing BPA with these analogues may not be making products safer for human health.
BPA is used in a wide range of consumer products with very concern toxicological properties. The European Union has restricted its use to protect human health. Industry has substituted BPA by BPA analogues. However, there is a lack of knowledge about their impacts. In this work, BPA and 5 BPA analogues (BPS, BPAP, BPAF, BPFL and BPC) have been studied in classical SH-SY5Y and the alternative 3D in vitro models after 24 and 96 h of exposure. Cell viability, percentage of ROS, cell cycle phases as well as the morphology of the spheroids were measured. The 2D model was more sensitive than the 3D models with differences in cell viability higher than 60% after 24 h of exposure, and different mechanisms of ROS production. After chronic exposure, both models were more affected in comparison to the 24 h exposure. After a recovery time (96 h), the spheroids exposed to 2.5-40 µM were able to recover cell viability and the morphology. Among the BPs tested, BPFL>BPAF>BPAP and >BPC revealed higher toxicological effects, while BPS was the only one with lower effects than BPA. To conclude, the SH-SY5Y 3D model is a suitable candidate to perform more reliable in vitro neurotoxicity tests.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Ecotoxicological effects and bioaccumulation of BPA analogues and their mixture in the clam Ruditapes philippinarum
Researchers exposed clams to three common bisphenol A substitutes (BPAF, BPF, and BPS) at environmentally relevant concentrations to evaluate whether these replacement chemicals are truly safer. The study found that all three BPA analogues caused oxidative stress, cellular damage, and neurotoxic effects in clam tissues, suggesting that these widely used substitutes may pose similar ecological risks as the compound they were designed to replace.
Single and multispecies microalgae toxicological tests assessing the impact of several BPA analogues used by industry
Researchers tested five BPA chemical analogues (intended as safer BPA replacements) on three marine microalgae species, finding that several analogues — particularly BPFL and BPAF — were more toxic than BPA itself and that results from single-species tests did not reliably predict community-level outcomes, raising concerns about the safety of current BPA substitutes.
Analogy or fallacy, unsafe chemical alternatives: Mechanistic insights into energy metabolism dysfunction induced by Bisphenol analogs in HepG2 cells
Researchers exposed human liver cells to three bisphenol A (BPA) replacements — chemicals used in plastics — and found that all three disrupted energy production in the cell's mitochondria (the cell's power generators), though through different mechanisms. The findings suggest that BPA substitutes are not necessarily safer and may cause their own form of metabolic harm.
Bisphenol Analogs in Aquatic Environments and Their Effects on Marine Species—A Review
This review summarized concentrations of bisphenol A analogs found across aquatic environments globally and assessed their toxic effects on marine species, finding that many BPA substitutes show similar endocrine-disrupting, oxidative, and genotoxic activity to the compound they replaced. The findings raise concerns that current BPA alternatives may not represent a meaningful safety improvement for aquatic ecosystems.
BPS and BPF are as Carcinogenic as BPA and are Not Viable Alternatives for its Replacement.
This review presents evidence that BPS and BPF — chemicals used as 'BPA-free' replacements in plastics — have similar cancer-promoting and endocrine-disrupting properties to BPA itself. The substitution of one hormone-disrupting plastic chemical with nearly identical alternatives means consumers are not actually avoiding the health risks they are trying to escape.