0
Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Writing a Scientific Review Article: Comprehensive Insights for Beginners

The Scientific World JOURNAL 2024 20 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ayodeji Amobonye, Ayodeji Amobonye, Ayodeji Amobonye, Japareng Lalung, Japareng Lalung, Japareng Lalung, Japareng Lalung, Gift Mheta, Ayodeji Amobonye, Santhosh Pillai Santhosh Pillai Santhosh Pillai Santhosh Pillai

Summary

This paper provides a step-by-step guide for postgraduate students on how to write and publish scientific review articles. It covers the entire process from selecting a topic and searching the literature to analyzing, synthesizing, and structuring the findings into a publishable manuscript.

Review articles present comprehensive overview of relevant literature on specific themes and synthesise the studies related to these themes, with the aim of strengthening the foundation of knowledge and facilitating theory development. The significance of review articles in science is immeasurable as both students and researchers rely on these articles as the starting point for their research. Interestingly, many postgraduate students are expected to write review articles for journal publications as a way of demonstrating their ability to contribute to new knowledge in their respective fields. However, there is no comprehensive instructional framework to guide them on how to analyse and synthesise the literature in their niches into publishable review articles. The dearth of ample guidance or explicit training results in students having to learn all by themselves, usually by trial and error, which often leads to high rejection rates from publishing houses. Therefore, this article seeks to identify these challenges from a beginner's perspective and strives to plug the identified gaps and discrepancies. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to serve as a systematic guide for emerging scientists and to summarise the most important information on how to write and structure a publishable review article.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper