We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microscopy of Woven and Nonwoven Face Covering Materials: Implications for Particle Filtration
Summary
Researchers used visible light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and micro-X-ray computed tomography to characterize fiber diameter distributions, fabric thickness, and solid volume fractions across woven natural and synthetic fabrics and nonwoven filtration layers from surgical masks and N95 respirators, finding nonwoven materials exhibit a positively skewed fiber diameter distribution with a mean of approximately 3 micrometers.
A suite of natural, synthetic, and mixed synthetic-natural woven fabrics, along with nonwoven filtration layers from a surgical mask and an N95 respirator, was examined using visible light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and micro-X-ray computed tomography (µXCT) to determine the fiber diameter distribution, fabric thickness, and the volume of solid space of the fabrics. Nonwoven materials exhibit a positively skewed distribution of fiber diameters with a mean value of ≈3 μm, whereas woven fabrics exhibit a normal distribution of diameters with mean values roughly five times larger (>15 μm). The mean thickness of the N95 filtration material is 1093 μm and is greater than that of the woven fabrics that span from 420 to 650 μm. A new procedure for measuring the thickness of flannel fabrics is proposed that accounts for raised fibers. µXCT allowed for a quantitative nondestructive approach to measure fabric porosity as well as the surface area/volume. Cotton flannel showed the largest mean isotropy of any fabric, though fiber order within the weave is poorly represented in the surface electron images. Surface fabric isotropy and surface area/volume ratios are proposed as useful microstructural quantities to consider for future particle filtration modeling efforts of woven materials.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Filtration Performance and Fiber Shedding Behavior in Common Respirator and Face Mask Materials
Researchers tested seven common respirator and face mask materials for how well they filter airborne particles and whether they shed fibers. The N95 respirator performed best with over 95% filtration efficiency, while cotton masks filtered only about 25% of particles; one mask also shed tiny dendrite structures similar in size to its nanoscale fibers.
Particles and fragments in unused disposable face masks: A microscopic analysis
Researchers microscopically examined commercially available surgical masks and found particles and fragments in the 2–40 micrometer range on fiber surfaces inside all masks tested, raising questions about whether mask wearers may inhale these microplastic-sized particles.
Viruses and Their Penetration Through Fibrous Structures: a Review
This review examines how viruses interact with and penetrate fibrous structures such as face masks and respirators, analyzing the filtration mechanisms and material properties that determine the protective efficacy of textile barriers against airborne viral transmission.
Filtration Performance of Layering Masks and Face Coverings and the Reusability of Cotton Masks after Repeated Washing and Drying
Researchers tested the filtration efficiency of various face masks and found that layering a cloth mask over a surgical mask improved particle filtration by about 25%, and that cotton masks retained their filtration ability even after 52 wash-and-dry cycles. However, the study also observed that repeated washing gradually broke down cotton fibers into micro- and nano-scale fragments, raising a subtle concern about microfiber shedding from laundered cloth masks.
Evaluation of Fiber and Debris Release from Protective COVID-19 Mask Textiles and in Vitro Acute Cytotoxicity Effects.
Researchers quantified fiber and particle debris released from textile-based face masks and surgical masks during the COVID-19 pandemic using both liquid and air extraction methods, finding that cotton-based textiles released up to 29,452 fibers per gram under liquid extraction while synthetic textiles released up to 1,030 fibers per gram. The study assessed the potential for inhaled mask debris to cause acute cytotoxic effects, raising questions about respiratory health implications of prolonged mask wear.